this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
496 points (85.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27172 readers
4247 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know I know... "obligate carnivore"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 87 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (15 children)

Well I mean the loud/extremist vegan minority are quick to call meat eaters as abusers ("rapist enablers" even because we'll drink milk a "rapist" (farmer) got from a cow) just for eating meat, even though most of us are far removed from the entire process.

But here they are, making a direct immoral action to force their chosen diet on another being who in all likelihood would NOT choose themselves. And that's on top of the fact they should probably not have a pet at all based on their strict interpretation of vegan.

Nah, they deserve the call out.

This entire drama has had me thinking about that one talk show clip that has a vegan guest and was talking about how their dog "Is totally vegan now and won't even choose meat if it's in front of her". When the hosts tested the dog by bringing out a vegan dish and a meat dish, the dog devoured the meat dish lmao

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (24 children)

Why do you think direct immoral actions are worse than indirect immoral actions? I don't buy that. Hell, you are even saying that you are absolved of responsibility for animal abuse completely just because you are paying someone to do it, and not doing it personally. Most people just deny animal abuse happens at all, but you admit it is immoral, yet shift the blame on others along with the responsibility for murdering them, which they do for your pleasure.

This is like saying "x has hired hitmen to killed seven people, but my parent forces me to eat broccoli every day, so since x is commiting a indirect immoral action, my parent is the worst one of them.

I am not a moral person. I, quite frankly, do not care about animals, and I would like to think I would be able to murder an animal myself(for food), since I am doing it now, albeit indirectly, and if you can't live with the consequences of your decisions, why make them? Weigh the consequences of your actions. Do not run away from them like a coward(a lot of moralizing for a self-proclaimed immoral person).

I respect vegans. If you care about animal welfare, and are opposed to cruel treatment of animals you should not eat meat, and that's what they do.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 3 months ago (8 children)

But here they are, making a direct immoral action to force their chosen diet on another being who in all likelihood would NOT choose themselves.

This is the single worst argument you could make.

Every single pet owner does that. Would any animal - including farm animals - choose to eat what humans provide them? Surely [cheapest store brand] wouldn't be popular if they had a choice.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can do two things, ya know.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (19 children)

Unashamed omnivore, fisher, and hunter here. Working on our play farm so we can source all of our meat ethically in the future. Taking active steps to prevent the suffering of animals we consume. Don't have an ethical or moral problem with killing animals to eat them. Prefer to do it myself so that I know that I have done my best to minimize the suffering of the critters I kill.

I've been told I'm a raper and abuser.

fite me

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Much better than sourcing animal products from the supermarker. Still worse than being vegan

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I’ve been told I’m a raper and abuser.

Factory farming is absolutely industrial scale rape and abuse. The more traditional hunter-gatherer mode of existence is at least approaching "natural" levels of cruelty, but it also takes immense volumes of vacant real estate.

It's cool that you've found a way to do a little traditional animal husbandry, rather than procuring meat from the holocaust mills run by some soulless corporate horror show. But its not what I'd call economical. At least, not for anyone who commutes downtown from an apartment block.

I think there's a kind of ethical middle-ground for folks who can keep a deep freeze full of meat from a cow that gets butchered every couple of months. Then you're at least mitigating the enormous waste in industrial agriculture and you can talk about animals living a relatively dignified life in a pasture rather than walled up in a cattle concentration camp. But that would mean no pink slime on demand, which violates man's constitutional right to eat burger.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

Fellow unashamed omnivore. The vegans have the moral high ground. I hope one day to become one. No need to shame or be ashamed of eating meat though. Changes to society take a while, shaming and blaming rarely improve the situation. It often makes things worse.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Cats are bad, generally.

They're killing machines that have a big impact on local wildlife.

A vegan that keeps cats isn't exactly approaching the situation from a purely vegan-based mentality.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (4 children)

As a person with 3 cats, I get what you're saying. You're getting down voted, but we all know cats can devistate local wild life populations.

Rescuing them and making them indoor cats is the responsible thing to do, but I don't think any vegans would argue with that.

I think its after those establishing facts that the discussion is taking place.

I personally am not a fan of any breeding programs when there are so many cats and dogs available to rescue, but that's just me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A vegan that ~~keeps cats~~ allows cats outside isn't exactly approaching the situation from a purely vegan-based mentality.

There, FTFY.

Absolutely nothing wrong with cats that are 100% indoors, not only do they have no effect on the wildlife, but their lifespans are something like ⅓ to ½ longer due to the lack of accidents or conflicts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago
[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Why wouldn't you fight against animal cruelty?

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Who knew that so many Lemmy users were experts in the science of dietary nutrition?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

live by the sword die by tbe sword

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Did I miss something recent?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Yeah c/Vegan had mods removed by a Lemmy.world admin because of controversial posts and opinions on a vegan diet for cats.

The removal was justified because that constituted animal cruelty, but it was reversed because scientific evidence was provided for the possibility of a vegan cat diet.

The vegan community I think said they were going to move to hexbear or some shit, lol.

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago

Yeah c/Vegan had mods removed by a Lemmy.world admin because of controversial posts and opinions on a vegan diet for cats.

Lol, after years of reddit and other big websites I forgot that admins can also get involved in dramas on their platforms. Reminds me of the internet 15+ years ago.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

This whole controversy has been a real boon to my blocklist.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (6 children)

nah, i just like making fun of and annoying vegans. They call me slurs that are metal as fuck like "carnist" and "bloodmouth", i love it.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You’re confusing the reactionaries with those who live by a philosophy.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago

I would say it’s the reactionaries confusing everyone

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I don't have any skin in the game as I am allergic to both cats and vegans.

However, I think this is kind of interesting because it is going to be one of the first major pieces of Lemmy Lore that a large amount of the userbase is aware of.

In a weird way it means we are forming the bonds of a real community, and even though this is clearly an antagonistic topic it is going to be a lasting piece of history that for better or worse defines our culture.

[–] owsei@programming.dev 17 points 3 months ago (10 children)

this and the three days without shitting post

[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 13 points 3 months ago

And the beans?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›