this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
48 points (98.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9728 readers
794 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

....And then they mostly couldn't be bothered to actually get college degrees despite how cheap they were, yet still ended up with good careers capable of supporting entire households with only one person working anyway.

Despite his cynicism, even Bernie manages to understate the problem here!

[–] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Just throwing out there, this was one generation out of however many to the dawn of time that was able to do this. And they did it on the backs of the hundreds of thousands of people that fought, starved and died to get unions established. For the vast majority of history, if you could work you worked man, woman & child because if you didn't your family starved. Then people fought for generations to get unions established and they finally did it and one single generation got the advantages of it before the next generation decided they didn't need no stinking unions as they were working white collar jobs and here we are. We're not standing together so we're falling together.

[–] Smoothie_Criminal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hillary stole Bernie's nomination and robbed Americans of his presidency

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Hillary didn't rob him of it; the Democratic Party robbed him of it.

And then Biden did it 4 years later.

See the pattern? Combined with all the "left" side of democrats support for US imperialism.

Bernie and people like him ain't gonna change shit, not any more in the future that they did in a past decades. It's time to radicalise way beyond him and the lukewarm electoral socialdemocracy, the only thing that can change something for the better, and did in the past, is the organised working class.

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kokoapadoa@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because of America's dogshit election system, she won the popular vote.

I'd give anything to go back in time and see how that election goes differently with an Approval Vote.

[–] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It was the Democratic establishment and the corporate media that stole it. The biggest thing they fear is a candidate that puts the American people over corporate interests.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did she steal it tho?

The Bern caved, which was a cuck move.

I still support him but that was a clown mistake imho setting working and young people back a decade or so.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

As much as I hate to say it, Democrats would've just lost even harder if the vote was divided. He did the right thing at the time, the democrat party never would've backed down on Hillary back then.

That entire election was egos that overestimated how things would go.

[–] BornVolcano@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Image Transcription: Twitter Post


Bernie Sanders, @BernieSanders

The Boomer generation needed just 306 hours of minimum wage work to pay for four years of public college. Millennials need 4,459.

The economy today is rigged against working people and young people. This is what we are going to change.


^I'm a human volunteer transcribing posts in a format compatible with screen readers, for blind and visually impaired users!^

[–] QRay@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we keep the timestamp in when cropping a post from another website?

[–] NOPper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

7:29 AM · Apr 24, 2019 for the record.

[–] vitucadrus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Try researching your masters degree in a Library using Microfiche. First reply here on Lemmy, just wanted to say "hello"

[–] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] RedClouds@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I guess my dads not A typical boomer, he openly emits that times were much easier for him. As this quote from Bernie implies, after taking to account inflation and everything around living your life, we work much harder and get much less than our parents or grandparents did.

Regarding getting off the gold standard, sure that might have some effect, and I'm not a finance major so I don't know all the details, but in the end, I think capitalists would have done whatever they needed to in order to suppress how much people make in compared to their productivity. Getting off of a standard was just the technique used at the time.

[–] smac@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, Bernie's full of crap. He's deliberately twisting facts to misinform. He's using today's highest minimum wage to calculate paying tuition at levels of 50 years ago, and trying to imply that people only needed to work 306 hours THEN to pay for college tuition THEN. That's just not true.

When I was working during high school / college, minimum wage was $1.50 / hr. That works out to $459 for 4 years of college education. Tuition at public institutions in the mid '70's was $1210 / year nces.ed.gov That's $4840 for 4 years at a time when my comfortably middle-class father was earning ~ $25 K / year. It was cheaper, but not by as much as Bernie claims.

Also, public colleges have always been subsidized by the state. You'd also need to look at the level of subsidy between then and now and whether we're choosing to subsidize less.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Subsidy is about the same the most places... admin bloat though requires higher fees from students.

[–] mawkishdave@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes something needs to change and I feel you are seeing the real panic of the right as more and more younger people can now vote and are just pissed as everything they are doing.

[–] hydro033@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People have been saying this since the 60s. Lots of young people are still conservative and many areas are still solidly red. I don't see a massive blue wave that garners a supermajority happening anytime soon.

[–] Kept7963@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Actually, it looks like this time it might be true.

Source

Next is speculation on my part, but I imagine people are turning conservative more based on their wealth than their age. We saw a correlation between age and conservative sentiment because people tended to gather wealth as they got older.

But that link has been progressively eroded, so people are no longer switching. Essentially the conservatives are killing the golden goose in their incessant pursuit of consolidating wealth.

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the only solution to this problem is subsidies.

Subsidies knowledge works well around the world.

[–] aregularbeaneater@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I think subsidies got us here in the first place. When the government pays for stuff it drives prices up.

[–] Discoslugs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bernie sanders screaming into the wind yet again.

Bernie i love ya but nobody is gonna do the things you say.

They are way too reasonable.

[–] ItchySunItchyKnee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn’t that kind of defeatist?

I don’t really have a horse in this race since I am not from the US.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's more cynicism than defeatism. People from the United States have pushed for these kinds of common sense reforms for our entire lives and we still have nothing to show for it.

[–] Vino@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Not easier, simpler.

[–] FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

This is very smart of him to use generational terminology to engage with young voters. He's looking at trends on social media. Maybe it will work for him. His main obstacle is that most democrats are moderate and don't have a problem voting republican if they think the democrat is too far to the left. Maybe engaging with young voters in this way can help him get over that obstacle.

[–] TPMJB@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not minimum wage's fault, it's the government guaranteeing student loans. Tuition skyrocketed since then and has been out of control since.

Then with so many people being told "You have to go to college so you don't become a garbageman!" the requirements for most jobs increased as well. Manufacturing in pharma, for instance, I could take a kid out of middle school and teach him the job in an hour. Get fresh grads from college for a bachelor's degree and they still need an hour of teaching. But now the Bachelors is required for some reason.

Ironically, garbage man pays pretty decent for some minimal manual labor.

[–] markr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Student loans were guaranteed way back in boomer days too. So that would be a non-difference.

[–] TPMJB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sallie Mae wasn't even a thing until 1973. Literally not boomers LOL. Federal student loans were very uncommon back before the 90s even and applied to only a few different areas, not everything. It is incredibly clear that something happened in the early 2000s that caused the current fiasco, with both tuition and debt skyrocketing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_tuition_in_the_United_States#/media/File:Tuition_cost_of_college.png

[–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

1980s, you say? Must be a total coincidence..

[–] nichos@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

College prices went sky high when the government started backing student loans, they should have never done that.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Except the government has been backing student loans since the GI bill passed in 1944. College tuition started growing in the 80s and really took off on the 90s and 2000s. So of the government backed loans didn't cause skyrocketing tuition for almost 2 generations, why did it start when millennials were just being born?