this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
318 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3070 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 95 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Plot twist: it’s just one user and he’s ripping them off by asking for donations to his campaign

[–] llamatron@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not much of a twist though. Those of us with more than 2 brain cells saw it coming a mile off

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 month ago

Some of us did from approx. 9000mi away.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, there is that, but this is not all that organized. It's easy to say ha ha, boomers dumb, but it's wild to think of how crypto schemes have shifted potentially billions of imaginary wealth into the real pockets of randos

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Oh. I know it’s not just that, I was just trying to make a joke

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 83 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, it is a goldmine of gullible people after all....

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 month ago

Can you blame the scammers? Like teasing a dog with a steak

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm just surprised they have large amounts of money to be swindled out of.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Truth Social’s seemingly target-rich environment is also home to romantic relationship scams, including one 72-year-old man reporting that, after chatting with a “beautiful” woman on the app, he was fleeced out of $21,000. “I haven’t told my wife about this blunder. She still doesn’t know about it,” his complaint read.

Yikes, votes to take away your wife's Healthcare then cheat on her with a scammer you met on truth social to the toon of $21k. Chef kiss.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe his wife is the scammer.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

"I Rob Banks Because That's Where the Money Is" - Alphonse Capone.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago

Self selecting suckers...

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

I mean that's why the owner set it up in the first place

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Am pretty sure Trump is taking a cut from the scams as well... Trumps grift has no limits

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah I imagine it’s like an MLM / pyramid scheme. It all trickles up. And the actual “reportable” fraud occurs at a very low level that the Trump campaign cannot easily be connected to.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It's not just his platform. Watch the dime-store networks that cover him. OANN, Real America, or whatever the fuck they're called. They'll show footage of Trump rallies right next to ads for Ivermectin, clearly obvious crypto scams, and ads you'd expect to see on some shady porn or torrent site.

Which isn't a surprise. Trump has corralled the dumb and gullible and made it nice and easy for scammers to target en masse.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good. The more money the swindlers take, the less those idiots can waste on Donalds campaign funding.

And maybe, just maybe the one or other learns a lesson from this.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 12 points 1 month ago

I'm not surprised.

Have you seen the scammers on other social media platforms? MLM schemes, love scams, charging a fuck-to of money to teach people how to write entry letters to casino sweepstakes for "free" online casino coins.

I can only imagine what a place that starts with gathering together people that view life as a zero-sum game develops for scamming and ripping people off.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder what, if anything, will by done about this by those in charge of the app.

Depending on how many "users" are actually scammers, a deletion of such accounts would lead to a decreased user count. Considering Dementia Don's obsession with bigly numbers, such an action would probably upset him. Besides, as other social media sites have proven, deleting scammer accounts without doing anything to deter them would simply become a game of whack-a-mole.

Highlighting tips to avoid scammers is what a lot of companies would do. But this is "Truth Social." Informing their users in order to protect them from scams would give away their own game. (Or do nothing, since so many of these users are already too gullible to function.)

Even before any of that, taking action requires admitting that they have a problem, which doesn't fit into the modern GOP handbook.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Depending on how many "users" are actually scammers, a deletion of such accounts would lead to a decreased user count.

Just include suspended accounts when publishing user counts. Like how Trump leaves his shoes on when he gets measured for a physical so people will think he's actually 6'3".

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I don't take my shoes off either, I just wear my chucks. I think there's a 1/4" sole on those.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Wasn't that the whole point of it in the first place?

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Well, wouldn’t you target those fucktards if you were looking to make a quick buck?

"you get what you fucking deserve."

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

A fool and his money.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, this is all social media these days. Especially the ads. I use an adblock (ofc), but some of my friends and family who don't are constantly getting baited.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Damn good point. Sometimes forget this is a form of social media too.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

target rich environment

And the biggest scammer on that platform...the orange turn himself

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Daily Beast:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trumps-truth-social-riddled-with-scammers-ripping-off-users-report
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support