this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
311 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3252 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 132 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Really glad the president of the USA finally decided to pull the lower inflation lever in the oval office.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My apologies

Really glad the ~~president~~ knob of the USA finally decided to pull the lower inflation lever in the oval office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

It's right next to the gas price slider. Duh.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

It's right next to the Gas Price Dial on the Resolute desk.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Now pay me more and we're good.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I saw this when I opened Edge for work this morning. Two worlds in one picture.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Someone is lying and I have a sneaking suspicion of who it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 month ago (6 children)

That's still 2.4% on top of the cumulated inflation of the past 5 years...

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 47 points 1 month ago

You misspelled price gouging.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sure. But inflation is down, we didn't go into a recession, and wage growth has been outpacing inflation for over a year now.

This is good, we're going in the right direction. Deflation would be way worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah but unfortunately that's never going to change. Inflation is the rate of increase and they always want a rate of increase, just at 2%.

It's never going to go negative because growth for the growth gods!! :(

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

Line must go up.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Actually, it will never go negative (I hope) because if it goes negative we're probably in for a massive global recession that will introduce untold suffering.

You think they aim for 2% because that's what's good for rich people? 2% is the magic number for the whole economy.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You want a deflationary environment? Are you sure?

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

That's what you got from my one line comment?

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If "deflationary environment" is neoliberal for "restrictions on and immediate reduction of the current ongoing price gouging" then call me Moleman cuz yes, i want that, right now.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, well, no, it's not. Do you want actual deflation?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The economy would tank really hard if wet somehow deflated it to go back in time. It doesn't work like that.

Plus the last 5 years was almost entirely from covid anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's just how inflation works though. Wages tend to rise slower than prices do. In economic terms, wages are "sticky." They rise and fall slower than prices do in response to market conditions. Long periods of slow gradual inflation are fine, as people simply demand that their wages rise at a steady 2-3% to keep up with inflation, and employers expect it. But if there is a sudden spike in prices, it's a lot harder for employees to suddenly negotiate wage increases. Instead, the slower process of labor market competition, employees leaving underpaying jobs for better paying jobs, has to take over. It's going to take a few years for wages to catch up with the spike in prices, but it does happen with time, primarily from people switching jobs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Food prices are still up twenty to forty percent.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right! and now, amazing news! Our expenses are only growing at a rate of only 2.4%!! Hooray?!?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (7 children)

2% is actually pretty good and about what you want. Maintaining flat spending power sounds great on paper, but also puts an economy at increased risk of recession and citizens at increased risk of ballooning debt.

[–] basmati@lemmus.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

That's nice and all, but wages do not increase year over year for most people, so most people would prefer those risks and be able to continue living, instead of helping to balloon the suicide statistic.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Most people are not economists. Most people would like everyone to be given $100,000 and a pony (or just white people, if you're a republican).

2% inflation is good. But an inflation number doesn't tell us where the gains are accruing. Ensuring gains go to workers and not capital is an entirely separate goal of the government.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's great the prices aren't going up more. Now go get all of these companies that are price gouging. It's good to protect people from it during natural disasters but unfortunate the government didn't consider COVID a natural disaster.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Oh they are still going up, just not as much.

[–] xlash123@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While this is good news, remember that this means that prices are still increasing due to inflation, just at a slower rate now. It does NOT mean that inflation has been reversed.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not sure why there are down votes here. It's an important fact to remember that inflation "falling" doesn't mean the cost of living is going down.

Whether reversing inflation is good or not isn't their point. The point is, living is still more expensive than last year and your wage hasn't been keeping up since the 70s.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

Probably because most people are too lazy to explain that deflation is a bad thing and incredibly hard to get unstuck. The "ideal" scenario is one where inflation stays low and wages outpace it. A small amount of inflation is a way to stop billionaires from sitting on piles of cash. At least with inflation they're incentivized to spend it on investments, some of which are good for the economy.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

Waiting to see the creative ideas Republicans come up with to try to tank it before November

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 7 points 1 month ago

Oh that's wonderful, because as we all know inflation is the only reason for the increasing prices...right? There couldn't be any other contributing factors?

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Too bad it's not on food prices

[–] blackwateropeth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Haters will say it’s because of the election coming up

load more comments
view more: next ›