The usual interpretation is the director was trying to move the plot along with things happening during the sex scenes, but the penis was so attention-grabbing that the audience missed the plot points, which made them struggle to follow the rest of the movie (be confused).

ive always imagined that test audiences believed it to be a prosthetic and therefore a deliberate creative choice by lars von trier. which is fucking hilarious, because it so thoroughly cheapens the serious arthouse themes he was playing with of like sex and nature and depression if you believe another theme he wanted to showcase was "and the guy has an absolutely monstrous hog"

IIRC, it was because the director thought the audience might think it wasn’t real.

He was spinning it around yes. Video is available online. It's quite the dangler.

Maybe they meant "concussed?"

They thought it was a snake trying to attack them.

Helicopter goes brrrrr

If you replace 'large' with 'small' the statement makes sense again.

Maybe he's got a monster schlong, or maybe someone changes one word for fun. Maybe it's Maybelline.

"Put that eldritch horror away."

Me witnessing horrors beyond my comprehension

(I don't get it)

It's OK. Welcome to the other side.

Off topic, but what's the source? And is this a physically valid walk cycle, or just an animation? The bit where the three feet are all in line looks pretty sketchy but it's potentially dynamically stable

Reminds of the "walkers" in Battletoads