this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
105 points (92.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26875 readers
2136 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems that over the past couple months or so, I started having and engaging in more political discussions (on account of the presidential election). When you're in that space, it feels like you need to have an opinion on every little thing. Geopolitics, taxes, financial policy, etc. How important is it to educate myself and ask questions? Do you feel that pressure to have an opinion on everything?

edit: I don't think this question is about politics, but if it is, I can delete this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Don't have an opinion. Have a code of ethics and empathy. That'll dictate your opinions when they are needed

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

It's ok to not have an opinion, and also ok to be ambivalent about something.

Your time and attention are not unlimited resources.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 1 points 48 minutes ago

I got a hell of a lot smarter when I allowed myself to not have opinions on things. Like if a friend asks me if I have heard of [thing], I am nowadays much better at saying "No, I havent, tell me more" or "I'm not sure. It sounds familiar though. Remind me?". A big part of this is being in spaces where it feels safe enough to be vulnerable in saying "I don't know".

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 hours ago

I pick my subjects based on how much I actually have a fair deal of knowledge about.

I don't dare enter discussions that's beyond my knowledge, like hardcore scientific shit.

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It is ok to not have an opinion or not want to divulge it due to backlash. Not worth wasting your energy on people looking for a fight.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago
[–] stackPeek@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

I think it's better to be quiet on a matter you don't understand.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

It depends on what the opinion is on If you don't have an opinion on whether strawberry or raspberry jam makes no difference

But if it's something that affects you or people you care about (or people you should care about) and you don't form an opinion that reflects badly

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 7 hours ago

I'd say that if you do have an opinion and state an opinion on something, then you should also know enough to explain why.

Specifically about politics, it's scary how many people have an opinion without knowing why. Politics is also something that everyone should have an opinion on, because it affects pretty much everything, so everyone do have an interest in something political. It shouldn't be based on feelings or the charisma of the candidate or group pressure. It should be based on what affects you and how you'd want it done.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

I mean, it's okay to not have positions on a lot of things. People tend to get upset if the position you're dithering over is whether they or their loved ones deserve to live or have equal human rights. Most other things, honorable people may differ.

How important is it to educate yourself and ask questions?

Very. Everything is political, and ignorance about politics is a luxury. It allows others to make decisions for you, often ones you wouldn't choose yourself.

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Having an opinion about everything is a sign of extreme hubris. Most people have no knowledge about most of things (lacking education and experience in most of the areas) yet many feel like experts in macroeconomy, geopolitics, social topics, culture - anything and everything.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 11 points 12 hours ago

Of course, it’s okay. Being able to say “I don’t know” is a sign of intelligence in itself.

A huge number of people form opinions based on very limited knowledge, but these opinions then become part of their identity, and they feel compelled to defend them tooth and nail. I think the middle ground here is the idea of “strong opinions, loosely held,” meaning you have an opinion, but you understand it’s based on the best knowledge available at the time. You leave room for new information and allow your opinion to evolve. In fact, most opinions probably should be like that. There are very few views I hold that I feel are almost guaranteed not to change.

The Dunning-Kruger effect plays a big role here. When someone gains a moderate amount of knowledge on a subject, they often feel like they have a good understanding of it. But as they keep learning, they realize just how little they actually know. Uninformed people, by contrast, don’t know what they don’t know. These are the ones who write comments on social media pretending they’ve solved complex issues with simplistic solutions like “just do X,” while completely ignoring all the nuance. When you then try to introduce that nuance, they dig their heels in, taking it as a personal attack rather than a critique of their idea. This happens because they didn’t leave room for new information - they locked in their opinion, made it part of their identity, and threw away the key.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 6 points 11 hours ago

Polite society - "Never, ever discuss politics or religion. Thinking that you can change someone's mind on either of these subjects is foolish and arrogant and the conversation will always, without fail, end in an argument"

Americans for some fucking reason - "Hold my high fructose corn syrup"

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 7 points 12 hours ago

Can I have your opinion on the weather on Raxacoricofallapatorians right now?

  • You've never heard of it? Absolutely fair that you don't have an opinion then.
  • You don't care? Also fair not to have an opinion.
  • You haven't bothered to stay up to date with Slitheen weather politics? Fair, no need to have an opinion.
  • You just don't want to form an opinion, just cuz? Yep, fair, no opinion it is.

Heck, you can have an opinion and just go "fuck it, no I am not sharing it". That's also fine.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 30 points 17 hours ago

Not having an opinion is MUCH better than sticking to an uninformed opinion with stubborn fervor. Nobody can possibly know everything, so it’s perfectly fine to take time out to research something, or decide that it’s not worth your time and forget about it completely.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 74 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, not having an option on something is fine. when people push you can always whip out "I don't know enough about the topic to have an opinion."

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 19 hours ago

And if you want to fuck with conspiracy wackos you add "So I would just refer to experts on the subject if I wanted to learn about it."

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Also an excellent way to end conversation about a controversial topic when needed.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 8 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, I don't know about that- that could definitely seem like an invitation to " explain" it to you

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

I have a hell of a lot of respect for people who are forthright and just say "You know, I don't have a lot of experience regarding , so I don't think I can weigh in on that"

it amazes me how seldom people are brave enough to admit they don't know something.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago

I would say it's better to not have an opinion than to have an uninformed opinion.

Like a kid who has a strong opinion on a food that they've never tried. How can you know you don't like something if you never tried it? Sure.

You could look at the ingredients and if you don't like anything that goes in it you can assume that you wouldn't like the end product, but at least some thought went into at that point.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t have an opinion about this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"I don't know enough to have an informed opinion about this" is an admirable stance to take.

When it's a cop-out for not wanting to be politically informed, it's a crappy place to be. It can sound a lot like "I don't know and I don't care".

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I’ve often said that in order to redirect a conversation because I don’t like the opinion of the person I’m talking to and not because I’m actually ignorant about the subject.

This happens at work mostly, and I can’t just nuke that bridge with the person because we have to keep being able to work together. I’d like to tell them off for being ignorantly intolerant, but instead it’s more effective to just take away their enthusiasm for whatever they’re talking about. Do it enough times and they’ll eventually find someone else to bother.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That can backfire and then you get a retarTed Talk about how their viewpoint is the right one.

I just say "Bless your heart." and walk away. Works best when talking to northerners because they don't know what that means.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

I’m in South Carolina, so that wouldn’t work so well here since everyone already knows what that means. I do agree that not giving them the opening to elaborate is key.

[–] proceduralnightshade@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

So this is interesting... My favorite of the definitions of "opinion" I found is

belief stronger than impression and less strong than positive knowledge

Because I was about to say that it's impossible not to have an opinion, which might not be entirely correct.

In DBT we were told that there are helpful, consequential and inconsequential ehm... evaluations? Assessments? Judgments? I don't know the exact translation. Anyway, an important thing I realized then was that opinions/values etc are not something you form consciously, they just kinda pop up in your head and change shapes depending on what you learn and experience. You are able to detach from your opinions, look at them from the outside.

edit: so what I ultimately wanted to tell you is that you can do this detachment thing with other people's opinions as well.

[–] _____@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

short answer: yes

long answer: opinions are kind of a privilege. if you're someone working 9 to 5 you probably couldn't give a shit about anything other than relaxing and winding down from the stress of a work week. if you're someone who manages to still be involved, congrats. pushing this unto other people imo is not fair. ideally people would work less and have more free time to get situated with how their surroundings are being legislated

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Deciding to ignore something that causes people to suffer because it doesn't affect you is wrong. Not having a set opinion on how to fix it is perfectly normal. Not everyone can understand the details enough to form an informed opinion. Just don't decide something isn't a problem because one group says it's not without real evidence, especially if they're the ones who created and/or benefit from the problem.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 19 points 19 hours ago

It depends. Of course it's fine to have no opinion about, say, which sports team should win the big game, because that doesn't matter. And even on bigger issues like fiscal policy, it's okay to just admit you don't know enough about a complicated subject to have an informed opinion. While I do think it's important to educate yourself as much as you can, no one can reasonably learn everything about everything in order to have all of the right opinions all of the time.

But some issues are both important and clear cut. Like, if someone says they have "no opinion" on whether LGBTQ people deserve equal rights... no, no I will not accept "no opinion" as an answer here. You don't need to read mountains of theory to disavow bigotry, and if anyone tries to give an excuse for why they won't, I'll consider that complicit.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 7 points 17 hours ago

I would argue that if you recognize you lack the knowledge to form an opinion, you’re doing better than 90% of people online.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 18 hours ago
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Certain things are OK to not have a political opinion on. Example: Taxes are complicated and most people don't understand them; most probably want to pay less of them but do not really need to put their limited political energy to focusing on them.
That applies to most nonpolitical subjects too... most things to have an opinion on like food, movies, music whatever, are generally of little consequence.

Things that affect the base existence of large swaths of the population, aka human rights, are not something a living citizen can admit a "don't care" opinion on. You either want to live free or you don't, and having no opinion on such is how you end up without the legal right to any opinions..

The key to both is to have a complete information stream before forming any opinion or comitting to not having one. I do a nonzero amount of research even before writing a lot of comments here on Lemmy to make sure my facts are straight, and maybe 40% of the time discover it's either not worth my time to write, or I was initially wrong and my comment shouldn't be made.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 12 points 20 hours ago

Sometimes it's also, is it really important to know? A lot of things I have complicated opinions of because things are nuanced and complicated in the real world, so for example even if you ask me it's not like I can just be for or against Israel or whatever. And I certainly don't feel like going over it again and again and again as people keep asking about random topics.

I swear americans have this weird thing where everyone needs to have a strong opinion on every topic all the time, and talk about it all the time so they can sus out if you're leaning democrat or republican. It's so weird. I'm not even american, I can't do anything about it! I'll keep my opinions where they belong, in my head, thank you.

It's important to be educated about those topics but I don't feel the need to make it my entire personnality, unlike some people. I have better things to do that actually brings me joy rather than doom and gloom over things I can't do anything about.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

On something, yeah. On everything? No.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago

I don’t care whether it’s OK or not

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago

It's fine to not have an opinion as long as you aren't making a decision based on that ignorance

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone thinks they need an opinion on everything until they order a sub from Subway and the server asks if they want 25 or 26 sesame seeds on their buns.

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 6 points 15 hours ago

25, I wouldn't notice the difference but it is more eco friendly.

Or 26, because if I don't pay extra for the 26th seed, it would be economically irresponsible for me not to take the free sesame seed.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Yes. I think it's good not to form opinions about subjects you don't know much about.

When it comes to voting in an election, it's possible to make good decisions about candidates without forming opinions about every policy issue. That's kind of the point of representative democracy.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Context really matters I don't have an opinion on a lot of sports due to disinterest while other people make their opinions on sports their personality. But there are some things that people should have opinions on even if that opinion is 'leave it to the experts'.

Having an opinion that is terrible might be worse than not having an opinion at all. For example, not having an opinion about other races would be better than having racist opinions.

I think what you are really asking is if people should have opinions about the things that affect them. Yes, they should have opinions about those things.

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 18 hours ago

I think it depends on what you may or may not have an opinion about.

Extreme example: if you don't have an opinion about nazis, you might be a nazi

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

"I don't know enough on the topic to have an opinion."... is what I use. I'll even use that if I just don't want to talk about something with someone I know doesn't know the topic

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

It's fine to not have an opinion. It's even fine to have an opinion and keep it to yourself. No-one has the right to an argument with you, after all.

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 3 points 17 hours ago
[–] magoosh@feddit.nl 4 points 19 hours ago

Lets abstract it a bit and turn it around: should every person immediately have on opinion on any subject or statement as soon as they learn about it? Even if they know absolutely nothing about it, or worse only know falsehoods?

If you think no, then people indeed do not need to have an opinion on something.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think it is truly possible to lack an opinion. Indifference is the opposite of caring, and therefore the opposite of both love and hate at the same time. Indifference is an acceptable state of mind, but it is still an opinion. I will postulate, as silly as it is in extreme abstraction, that the opposite of opinion is only possible in death. Existence itself implies a state of awareness and opinion on abstracted levels of consciousness.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

You need to have an opinion on everything that ever happened. Every forgotten Canadian drama series, every city in the Dominican Republic, every American football player. If you don't you are failing to appreciate the world in all its glory and will go to hell as a consequence.

load more comments
view more: next ›