this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
373 points (91.0% liked)

Greentext

4411 readers
1299 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 hours ago

Remeber when greentext was something interesting or toughtfull? Instead of fariytales for incels?

[–] aquinteros@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 10 points 7 hours ago

ELO is a term used in ranked competitive video games. Part of this author's sense of humor is that tinder is a ranked game

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

Can women message people on Tinder they haven't matched with?

And if this was effective wouldn't it lower all women's Elo scores? Unless he only ignored one group and catfished everybody else. Sounds like a lot of work.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is an unrealized thought experiment by op. I don't believe the Chad he imagines has any relation to the man most woman are looking for.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Op creates profile that makes him look rich and stupid.

Gets targeted by bots using ai generated images of mildly attractive women.

Thinks he’s actually attracting human beings.

Anon still has never willingly gotten the attention of a human woman besides his mother

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

And I'm telling ya his momma is a nice lady.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 100 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 158 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago

It's not often I actually laugh when reading a comment. This was one of those times

[–] tkohldesac@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 49 points 1 day ago

Hi dying, I'm dad.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago

Sorry for your loss.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

This interaction may have made my night

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally, I don't like the fact that every team-based video game uses ELO, a system designed for a 1 on 1 game, to determine an individual's skill.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

While Elo (and side note: it's a person's name, not an acronym) isn't perfect and systems like Glicko-2 are better even for 1v1s, is there a better system than Elo that could be used to rate players in team games? Especially if there's a mix of pre-made teams and random teams thrown together by matchmaking?

Edit: extra bonus if it can be applicable in games that have both 1v1 and team game components where there might be a desire for some form of bleed between the two. (e.g. AoE2 where your starting Elo in one of them is based on your Elo in the other, if you've played a lot of one type of game before trying the other.)

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect games tinker with the formula behind the scenes, to accurately place people faster if nothing else. The more players the longer it could take for the skill of any one to show up in the numbers, so I bet they factor in other game specific metrics at least at first. There would be some risk of this being abused, but that's less if they keep it a secret and maybe the progress numbers shown to players aren't quite the same as the real numbers used to decide who to match them against.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Plenty of developers of competitive games with SBMM have said they actually make it more about keeping the player playing than actually giving a shit about their skill. They don't use straight up elo, but everything they do does derive from it. They also don't really disclose how they come to the numbers it assigns you; probably because they don't want to expose exactly how their skinner box works.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Street Fighter 6 uses two systems. League Points are a "keep them playing" type, and Master Rate is pretty much pure Elo.

Everyone starts with LP only and initial placement matches put you into a league with progressively fewer guard rails as you live higher. Rookie league can't lose LP at all, there's a win streak bonus up to gold, and you can't demote to a lower league until platinum. Throughout it all there's very slight upward pressure on LP, you get slightly more more a win then you lose for a loss.

Finally you reach the topmost league, Master, the final guard rails fall away and you're given 1500MR to join in the net zero Elo ranking pool. You basically need to demonstrate that you have a willingness to keep playing before they will use that style of matchmaking. "Real" skill based ranking effectively begins there, with the lower ranks being made more to show dedication rather than just ability.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

That sounds kinda similar to how AoE4 does it, albeit with fewer of the more complex guard rails.

The game only displays your "rating", which resets each season and is used to place you into a certain league. You have two ratings: 1v1 and Team Game. There's slight upward pressure so if you keep playing you should on average climb. At the end of the season you get some basic cosmetic rewards (profile pictures etc.) based on the highest Ranking achieved throughout the season.

The game also keeps a hidden MMR/Elo. That does not reset each season and is the tool actually used by the matchmaking system to decide who you will be playing against. It's a true Elo system, or possibly an Elo-like system such as Glicko. The game keeps track of separate MMR for 1v1, 2v2, 3v3, and 4v4.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I thought it was common knowledge that the pickier you are on Tinder, the better your matches will be. Swipe right on everyone and you won't have much luck on that app.

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like when they discriminated against users because of their age...

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A quick Google shows that they charged over thirties in the UK double for a premium account.

Devils advocate says that is because older people are more like to have money (people are probably getting a bit more desperate at that age too).

It looks like the policy is revoked tho.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 7 hours ago

We should charge people based on their ability to pay for food too!

[–] haerrii@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

What a great rabbit hole, thanks!

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It stands for female humanoid and is exactly as dehumanizing as it sounds

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago

It was femoid originally but anon got even lazier.

I think that the part being dehumanized is the one that uses that word.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SPRUNTnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I think it's supposed to be some kind of derogatory label for women, but is really just an identifier that the person using it is a worthless being whose opinion is as relevant as a gnats thoughts on the economy.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›