this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
49 points (94.5% liked)

movies

1775 readers
303 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Another movie(s) nobody asked for.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Musicals are massively popular. People go to them to get drunk and sing along too loud, and maybe have a fight.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I have no problem with musicals.

Wicked was published in 1995. Making this movie might have made sense up to 2009, but now? It's a sentimental cash-grab. Same reason they're making Gladiator 2.

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I did ask for it. Not holding my breath thou.

Also I wanted a series, could have been a 1 or 2 season arch and then Netflix or whoever could flail off into other characters and deeper cannon and non-cannon lore, and I would have had my fill and moved on.

[–] Waldowal@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I want it to flop so that studios stop pulling this multi-part bullshit.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's probably not going to flop.

Wicked is one of the most popular Broadway musicals of all time. There's been a lot of marketing for this film, and on other non-Fediverse social media platforms there's been a lot of buzz and genuine excitement for this.

It'll probably break even on the first film's gross alone; Part Two's gross will be pure profit.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 12 hours ago

Ahem. Cats.

[–] TheVelvetGentleman@hexbear.net 4 points 11 hours ago

I saw Wicked on Broadway because my wife wanted to go even though both of us hate musicals. It did nothing to change our minds about musicals. It was also one of the loudest experiences of my life, and I've gone to DJ sets where it felt like my heart wasn't beating.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I was a bit excited but this constant two part money grab bullshit is just too much. In no way was two movies necessary.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 12 points 17 hours ago

I’m not a fan in the slightest but someone else said that the stage production omits a lot of stuff from what is written in the books. If that is true then there’s a possibility that the film(s) could be an expanded version… but it’s probably just a cash grab.

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Aww damn, I didn't know it was going to be two films. Guess I'm not watching it until both are released now. I can't stand watching one film and not getting a resolution to the plot for like a year or two.

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I can, but only when it makes sense.

It made sense for Dune, where the story is too vast to tell in one movie of reasonable length. Lawrence of Arabia proved that it is possible, but also that it's not easy.

This was a stage production, which you watch in one sitting, with intermission, more than likely.

In this adaptation, that intermission will be longer than half an hour. Way longer.

I have no hope that it will turn out to be a good adaptation.