this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
132 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
1959 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg urged Democrats to stay focused and avoid being consumed by outrage over Donald Trump’s return to prominence.

Speaking to young Democratic officials, he emphasized re-engaging with voters through personal connections rather than relying solely on social media, calling for a return to pre-digital campaign strategies.

Buttigieg also pledged to defend President Biden’s achievements, warning that Republicans, including Trump, might attempt to take credit for them.

He cautioned Democrats against being paralyzed by shock tactics and hinted at remaining active in politics, though he withheld specifics about his future.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Pete can help unmesmerise us by promising not to run in the next primaries and endorsing a working class, rule-of-law candidate.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Why? Like honest question. Why wouldn't you want him to run?

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don’t trust anybody who gets elected mayor of a small to medium-sized city in Indiana and immediately says, “well I’m ready to be President of the United States now”. It’s abnormally grandiose.

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

He is a conformist and a party creature through-and-through. He's fine if you had no real objecgion to the way Biden governed except for his age. If you found Biden to be disastrous on a moral and political level, and you view the current Democratic Party as unfit or unwilling to chart a better course, then Buttigieg is liostick on a pig.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

Not them. For me, Buttigieg was my 3rd preference in the 2020 primaries. I like him. I think he has a grasp of what must be done. Fun fact, he wrote an essay that won a contest with the JFK library back in 2000, essentially praising Bernie Sanders. I think he has his own method by which he achieves a similar outcome, possibly.

That said he isn't who comes to mind to win in 2028 because while I think he's one of the best debaters, I'm not sure if he's the most charismatic. In this popularity contest, charisma matters. He kind of suffers from Al Gore syndrome in that way.

I won't be one of those gatekeepers claiming a gay guy can't win, though. That just amplifies the bigotry more, and we shouldn't get in our own way.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 4 points 7 hours ago

McKinsey stooge that got caught fixing bread prices. He's an unlikable charlatan neoliberal through and through.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -3 points 9 hours ago

While I dont like Pete...

If we're looking for someone to sabotage an elected government, you can do a lot worse than a McKinsey man...

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/12/6/20998972/pete-buttigieg-mckinsey-fundraisers-elizabeth-warren

Definitely don't want to hand him the keys in 2028, but fighting fascism makes strange bedfellows

But probably the least shady shit McKinsey gets up to, is getting paid a shit ton of money to tell CEOs that the right thing to do is layoffs and increase executive bonuses.

It's never the right answer, but it's usually the one the executives paid to get, so they can say "this wasn't our choice".

He'd make a great republican, but there is zero reason for him to ever have a position in the furtherest left option voters have.