23

A Scottish research team believe they may have produced the "holy grail" alternative to palm oil.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Christ, that article was hard to read, with 90% of it dedicated to the importance of palm oil, and random ads making you believe the article is finished. So, here's the part that matters:

Food experts at Queen Margaret University (QMU) in Edinburgh say their new 100% plant-based ingredient is 70% better for the environment.

And with 80% less saturated fat and 30% fewer calories, they are also hailing PALM-ALT as a significantly healthier option.

Catriona Liddle, one of the lead developers on the QMU team, said: “It’s the holy grail to replace it and still have exactly the same end result in product – to taste the same and have the texture the same – and we’ve done that.

“We’ve put it through some special sensory testing to see if a panel can tell the difference between our product and traditional palm shortening, and they can’t.”

The new PALM-ALT product is described as having a mayonnaise-style consistency.

It is made from a by-product from the linseed industry, plus natural fibre and rapeseed oil.

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And funny they state its healthier when rapeseed is some of the worst foods you can consume.. and with lint seed.. i mean those things arent even food to begin with.

Yuck. Steer clear or suffer the inflammation

[-] Lowbird@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

We'll see if their claims pan out, but the taste of palm oil vs other oils was never the point, anyways. It may not matter if it tastes different.

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

So they're replacing sfa and mct with omega six pufas? Barf.

[-] PlantJam@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

The applications of this type of product wouldn't care about any of that. If anything the improved macro nutrients (decreased calories and saturated fat) would be seen as an improvement. If this is truly a 1:1 replacement like the article is suggesting, it could be huge.

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe it wouldn't be harmful for cosmetics (I don't know) but it would for food. A true replacement would need to approximate the fatty acid profile, not just throw a bunch of inflammatory industrial waste in for cheap filler.

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

That sounds promising.

I wish the article had more context or comment from other experts in the food industry. It's good to interview the article's authors, but it's not clear if the hype is warranted.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3906 readers
1 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS