this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
-17 points (27.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35919 readers
1198 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

i was wondering about that, i mean technically it could be considered the last war because it was before the modern era (1900) and yes,i know about world war and etc but what i mean is that the mexican-american war was the last one that didn't have a lot of planning into it, similar to wars in the older days,,like there was no system control back then or like radio so technically, while not true, could it be considered "the last war of humanity"?

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 24 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not even sure what you’re asking. Where did you hear it called that?

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

why is the mexican-american war considered "the last war of humanity"??

why do you consider the mexican-american war "the last war of humanity"??

[–] adrianhooves@sopuli.xyz -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

because it was the last one to be similar to the ones from the older days and that it didn't use any tech!! between two countries

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It might seem like there was an "old days" in war compared to modern times but technology in war has always been continuously improving and has often been the decisive factor.

In the America-Mexico war the Americans had a distinct technological advantage being able to use the newer and more accurate 1841 Springfield rifle. They also had superior artillery technology.

If you mean the "old days" as in mass troop movement on the field and hand to hand fighting and no computers then there was plenty of that all over Europe and elsewhere later in the 1800s all the way up to WWI.

See the Crimea War 1853-1856 and the Franco-Prussian war 1870-1871 for some notable examples. (Both with rifles, troops marching on the battle field, cannons, horses etc)

[–] Boinkage@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Okay, so there are some stupid questions.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] Today@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

By humanity, do you mean with hand-to- hand combat? I'm not sure when that ended, but i would expect it to be around that time.

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

I don't have a complete answer, but the mechanization of warfare should have a lot to do with it. Things like the semi-automatic pistol -- they would have called it an "automatic" pistol during that era -- the modern hand grenade, the airplane for reconnaissance (although lighter-than-air balloons might have been used? IDK), and other weapons wouldn't have really appeared for the Mexican-American War (1846-1848).

Or did you mean the Spanish-American War (1898)? I think the same logic still stands, especially since train networks would have been more fully developed by the turn of the century.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

Are you talking about: "from the pov of the US"?

Because otherwise: no, obviously absolutely not.