this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
55 points (96.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27036 readers
1809 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago
[–] Berny23@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 4 hours ago

Pirating of otherwise unavailable media.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Taking food when you have no food

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago

Actual marriage equality.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Dumpster diving. Doesn’t matter if it’s food or merchandise. It should be illegal to lock a dumpster or willfully destroy usable goods.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Locking dumpsters is important in some areas so wild life dosen't get into them. To quote the National Parks service,

"There is a significant overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest humans".

[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago

Dumpster diving laws are more about trespassing and removing liability anyway.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You've never had to repeatedly clean trash slurry off of a concrete slab because junkies are terrible people who have no manners. If people could be trusted to not redistribute the trash across the land I wouldn't mind so much

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

If capitalism could be trusted not to put valuable items in the trash, it wouldn’t be a problem.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, so getting things out of the trash could be legal, but making a mess from a dumpster should have consequences

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Enforcing that would take a lot more money than a padlock.

A better idea would be to charge businesses for the downstream costs of externalities like waste. Make them self-enforce by making it more expensive to dump recyclable or reusable materials.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Euthanasia/medically assisted suicide.

The cruelty to force people to stay alive while slowly dying and suffering with terminal diseases is horrible. It’s traumatic for everyone involved, and it’s pointless.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We give animals more dignity in death than we do humans.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CiderApplenTea@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

*animals. If people come across (irreparably) hurt wild animals, those tend to get killed as well

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I think male chicks get treated worse than humans when they are identified at the factory farms

[–] Femcowboy@lemm.ee 33 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Prostitution. Keeping it illegal makes it so much worse for everyone involved except human traffickers.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It would be such a large boost in tax revenue at the very least.

[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

I love the idea of someone being brought up for tax evasion charges because they were only claiming a blowjob rate when they were doing anal.

This could be the most interesting audit in the history of the IRS.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 42 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Abortion. No specific circumstances needed. If a woman wants an abortion, it should be allowed. There is no one getting late term abortions that didn't want the child and something tragic happened and now they need one.

[–] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

At what point is it no longer an abortion, though?

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's not a gotcha, it's very simple. Doctors decide whether a fetus is viable outside the womb, and if it is, then it's a birth. The line for this keeps shifting earlier as neonatal medicine improves. Doctors aren't going to destroy a child that can live, they took a hypocratic oath. Once it's outside on its own, "my body my choice" no longer applies.

In fact, the opposite is frequently a problem, where enormous intervention is given to keep an extremely premature child alive when all you are doing is guaranteeing them a lot of suffering. There are plenty of parents who wish in retrospect that the option to simply not intervene had been offered, because they see how much pain their child goes through. It is already perfectly fine, legally and ethically, to decide that a child is simply too weak to have a good quality of life. You can offer them milk (if they feed on their own that is a sign of good health and probably won't ever happen with a case like this), but after that hold them and say goodbye.

People talking about late term abortions and killing babies after ripping them out of the womb at 40 weeks are completely divorced from reality. That's Alex Jones level bullshit.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

As a caveat to the last sentence, it's definitely possible for women to not know they're pregnant until very late in the process. There have even been women who only found out they were pregnant when they went into labor.

[–] tdgoodman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

I know a family that had 6 hours of pregnancy, and they, like most in the same situation, did not seek a late term abortion. By the time labor sets in, the fetus is developed enough to survive outside the womb, so anyone seeking to end the pregnancy without taking possession of a child, should be allowed to simply demand that the fetus be removed. It should be up to the medical staff to decide how.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

For now all I can think of are drugs (every single one, including opioids) and euthanasia (not just for terminal diseases, should be available for everyone who decides to).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (7 children)

Poverty, being unhoused.

Felons should have the right to vote.

Seeking gender affirming care.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 60 points 13 hours ago (17 children)

Weed (not legal in all states)

Most hallucinogens (at least for medical or supervised use)

Being trans (lotta states trying to ban me)

Being gay (they're probably next)

Abortion (many states ban this now)

Free healthcare (not technically illegal, per se)

Being homeless

Polyamory (not technically illegal afaik, but there are a lot of legal benefits that married couples get which aren't extended to polyamorous relationships due marriage being restricted to couples only)

The list goes on because while there are many basic things that aren't technically illegal, the system is set up in a way to fuck you because of the required profit motive behind offering basic necessities in a capitalist society.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The first five you listed are all one thing: bodily autonomy. We each have the right to do to ourselves whatever the fuck we want.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 3 points 7 hours ago

Not in the US we don't lmao.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›