people not wanting to consume milk should stick to products with positive confirmation that it is milk-free.
So maybe like a package of butter that doesn’t have milk in the ingredients list?
people not wanting to consume milk should stick to products with positive confirmation that it is milk-free.
So maybe like a package of butter that doesn’t have milk in the ingredients list?
It’s also around the time they did away with their jobs board thing isn’t it? I got a job through it in 2021 and somewhere after that they sunset it, which was an insane business decision because it was the best job search platform out there.
Every peer reviewed study on it says between 14.5 and 19.6% is animal agriculture.
While animal agriculture is responsible for 20% and eating plants directly instead of feeding them to animals first would use 75% less land which means we could grow forests at here that store carbon.
The original commenter here just conveniently ignored that though.
The political advocacy would (in the best case) still end up with a ban on these actions that disproportionately impact the climate so why not just start getting used to tofu already?
Which animals hands do you think you’d need to shake?
Then why do they kill and eat them
Abdicate years ago instead of bending the laws that prevented him from ruling indefinitely
If you’re doing it for companionship, get male chicks so they don’t put them in the macerator.
If you think you’re not seeing propaganda, you are not seeing the propaganda.