this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
634 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

5380 readers
364 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 114 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

This would definitely get hella views on twitch just for the fact that its live 24/7

[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 35 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm honestly not sure, I think it's actually been tried at this point. There's novelty there, at first, but it has to get boring after awhile. Most people just aren't that interesting, when you get down to it. Not on a constant 24/7 level.

[–] driving_crooner 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A guy in Japan already try it, with an hotel that was 24/7 streaming everyone even inside the rooms. The streaming revenue was not enough to keep it ans it had to revert to being a normal hotel.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They had a guy volunteer to be in a room for awhile too, he had a hard time of it:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/01/entertainment/the-contestant-hulu-documentary-nasubi/index.html

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Have you ever watched Jim Carey? Say one thing for Jim Carey. Say he's entertaining.

[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Have you ever watched Jim Carrey just sleep? How about scrolling the stock market while taking his morning dump? Brushing his teeth?

How much mundane shit does your average person do in a day?

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

People would die from boredom, watching me browsing Lemmy at work, at home, commuting and while sleeping.

They would love to see me for over an hour writing a comment, just to discard it, then upvote the great comment i wasn't able to write a good response to.

Day 17,800

"subscribed to a new community?"

"Yeah, the first new subscription, in 20 years"

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 96 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the point was that there were also paid actors intentionally stirring up drama around him.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 50 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Like, how much drama can they pull around a baby?

Especially if it is 24/7 for multiple years.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 82 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Have you ever raised a baby? They're 90% drama, 10% sleep. Guaranteed the early days of the Truman Show were flooded with parents watching the actor mom struggle to deal with the constant crying. Crying because hungry, refusing to eat because they're too busy crying, crying because they're tired, but too busy crying to sleep. I bet tons of parents were watching it, commiserating, or judging, or arguing about how she should be doing this instead of that. The drama writes itself.

Not to mention the moments when they're being extremely cute. When they roll over in bed and stare wide eyed at a stuffed toy, then flail at it and coo little baby noises at it. Maybe bite on it and shake it around like a little puppy. People love that shit. If a live stream of a fixed camera in a car cafe can get millions of views, a live stream of a baby doing baby things can easily get lots of viewers.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Fucking hell that is the best description of a baby ever written. I’ve raised three of them now and that is exactly the experience: 90% testing your resolve not to leave them at the fire station and 10% being so ridiculously cute that you would die for them without hesitation.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's instincts at work, baby!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chickenf622@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago

Well there can be drama between the characters with the baby as the catalyst for the conflict.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Just lock a bunch of writers into a room and don’t let them out until that baby is in peril.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago

In the early years he would have been barely a prop. Things happen around him but not to him.

You watched Full House season 1, right?

Compare Canonical. Shuttleworth has apparently lost bags of money on his dream, for like decades by now, and apparently only last year or so showed a real profit, but kept on going. Same deal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The first few seasons of Big Brother UK had nighttime episodes where you could watch the contestants sleeping. They were very popular, and even had catch up shows so you could see what you'd missed 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Same here in Germany, but they weren't sleeping. People were watching because of all the trash whispering and waiting for the first touchy situations inter the covers.

They even had a time where one channel was broadcasting live nighttime. I think that stopped after a few seasons.

Those first seasons were pure trash, but so naive, compared to what it mutated to over the years.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 64 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Bit of trivia I learned this week... The Truman Show house is Matt Gaetz' childhood home.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It had to be somebody's house... 😆

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And yet it is somehow diminished by this fact.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

One could look at it as the movie trying to redeem the house, making sure at least something good came from it. 🤔

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's true. Plus it's not the house's fault. That was unfair of me.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

It was understandable reaction to have. I'd be a bit upset about any house having him in it.

[–] youstolemyname@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing is sacred in this world!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 58 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They jazzed it up with fake scenarios specially to boost ratings. Haven't you seen the movie? That was more of the point than just the fact he was being filmed. His life was all Hollywood bullshit. His own father was "killed off" when he was a kid, but the man didn't actually die.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Keep in mind his birth was live. They said by random chance in the film, but I suspect they induced labor and this was something like a post-Superbowl event that was hyped up.

So even if the show got boring, everyone would have been aware. So maybe you are just flipping through the channels (as was the style at the time), if the baby shows up you might watch for a few minutes just to see what it's up to.

Remember Reddit had that hotdog in gelatin? I'd want to check in on that every few months.

The first few years were probably inexpensive and eventually things would get interesting.

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Never saw a hot dog in gelatin, but there was one encased in resin

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Oh resin! That's what it was.

[–] youstolemyname@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's terrifying, thank you

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Marketing, and this movie came out during the Reality TV era, it was the peak commentary of where we were heading as a society if we stayed on the course we did. Wanting to know everything about someone’s life, start to finish.

(I’m saying that from both the POV of us watching it as well as the people watching from within the movie)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 weeks ago

Reads post

Has the author not met humans?

hypothetically, there was also the literal world building around the kid. the enormous 'set' would have taken years to build. i can imagine a chunk of early broadcasting demonstrating the build and subsequent soap drama of all the actors to fill that void.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Being lightly scripted, drama would be easy to add:

Oh no, the mom put the baby on the counter near the stove with boiling water!

[–] gil2455526 14 points 3 weeks ago

Oh god, they foreshadowed the whole slew of YouTube channels based on kids and their parents.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 15 points 3 weeks ago

I feel like this comment is ignoring a whole bunch of cat TikTok. Plus a whole bunch of grocery haul Youtube, for good measure.

I mean, canonically they aired a live birth and then just had a 24/7 babycam. I'd watch.

What I don't get is how they got through the 5-15 period, because there are plenty of real world parents that tune out for that already.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I went to work for a cable company in 2007. This old timer there told me about his cable TV dog turd theory. His theory said that you could put a camera on a dog turd in your yard and leave it on for a month. When you switched it off there would be hundreds of calls about why this channel was off. There would complaint after complaint that there was a fly that was about to land on the dog turd and they missed it.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

The first couple of years were exclusive to OnlyFans and made huge sums of money from breast feeding fetishists. This financed them well into the toddler years.

[–] lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (17 children)

Have you (rhetorical you) seen the ridiculously boring and shallow shit that people watch nearly 24/7 now, though? Video platforms are filled with useless nonsense and people eat it up.

There are people who will have a show playing in the background every hour of the day, showing the "news" or soap operas or reality shows or game shows or movie reruns or etc etc, just soaking it up subconsciously forever until they die.

Go to any doctors office or bar or restaurant (in the US, anyway, maybe it's different elsewhere) and there's a high chance they'll also be playing some nonsense drivel on a dozen TVs strategically positioned so you can't sit anywhere in the place without being subjected to a view of one.

Society loves giving attention to the most inane shit available, even if just for background noise.

The idea of there being an audience for the early years of the Truman Show doesn't seem at all like an unfathomable stretch to me.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Says the person who's never had a baby, clearly.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›