this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
464 points (98.7% liked)

tumblr

3480 readers
652 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 60 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It would be really really awful if we started flooding the tip hotlines with false/conflicting information

[–] rooster_butt@lemm.ee 39 points 2 weeks ago

You can flood it with names of people whose coverage was denied and call it motive. No false information needed.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

But that would be illegal!

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago

Just go to any health forum, find random usernames complaining about the company and call it as a tip. Not wrong, just dumb

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but I’m in another country. If I called in tips from Canada that are false is that still illegal?

[–] moody@lemmings.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, the FBI would likely know that it's coming from Canada and could get the RCMP involved.

This is only discussing the legality and not the ethics of it though.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Man why do Americas problems always have to be Canada’s problems too? Like why does the FBI have to be MY problem, that’s your guys mess. :(

[–] moody@lemmings.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

You say that while suggesting you would interfere in an investigation in the US.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cause the rich in every country want the gestapo to keep everyone in line everywhere, so they make sure the fascist enforcement arms can work together easily.

In this case you should be blaming your politicians and the RCMP, not the FBI. The FBI can't come to your country and do shit to you without your country's permission.

Remember that the rich do not have patriotism, or a sense of responsibility to society or their community. They are above all that. Until we bring them back down to earth. Or under it.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“Bring them down to earth. Or under it.” That’s a fantastic quote. Did you think of that yourself or is that from something?

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

From the mind of yours truly. Sounded good while I was writing the post.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Not passing moral judgment, but if you commit a crime in a country other than yours, that country's authorities will be after you. For a change, this isn't the US being the US

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

TYL: the US has always been everyone else's problem — and our own.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not discussing anything else, but you're talking about inserting yourself into the FBI's business, so of course they're going to insert themselves into yours too.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, really. Don't encourage people to commit stupid crimes that could send them to prison.

I don't know the legality of feeding them useless, but true tips. This is your own risk.

I absolutely do know the legality of lying to the FBI. Don't do this. Don't encourage people to do this.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

There's nothing illegal about going to the lookalike contest today at 1.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Let's open the closet to see how many people are celebrating this CEO getting shot, surely it can't be that many"

The closet in question:

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I always die like three seconds into that dungeon. I think there’s a spell I have to cast, or something I don’t have yet.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Great use of a fireball/meteor swarm if you have it though.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 47 points 2 weeks ago

"We're not responsible, the algorithm did it."

We're not responsible, the bullet did it.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

How in God's name could that be "bigotry"

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

An astonishing number of people can't distinguish "hatred based on target's intrinsic, immutable features" from "hatred based on target's opinions."

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Almost like there are a ton of bad-faith actors out there intentionally muddying the waters, isn't it?

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah that was autocorrect for some reason

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

It can possibly be seen as bigotry against the patients that have received denial of coverage, but even that is a stretch.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some fuckwits would actually argue this I guarantee it.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's what they do.

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair, the title might have been a tad more sarcastic than people might first think :)

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Because greedy scumbag CEOs are a minority class?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I hadn't heard that algorithmic health care decisions had been ruled illegal. If the company were doing that, couldn't they be considered a criminal enterprise?

[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Presumably they stopped doing it in those states, or it's being appealed or something.

Also possible they're just ignoring a court order, I suppose, but that seems unlikely

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They definitely made an exception for those states. The same thing happened with the announcement of that Blue Cross branch that was going to stop paying for anesthesia after an arbitrary time limit. They made an exception for Connecticut because they passed a law making it illegal.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago

Given how businesses work they probably didn't stop doing it they probably just toned it down a little bit. Like instead of "deny 50% of coverage by default" they set it to like "deny 43%".

As long as it flies under the radar right?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Only ruled illegal in a couple of states. And no, doing some illegal things doesn't make you (under the law) a criminal enterprise. That's a term used for operations whose fundamental business is crime, as opposed to just employing some illegal methods in the pursuit of legal activities.

(This is not, remotely, an argument against much, much stronger penalties for companies that do illegal shit. If the fine is less than the profit then its just a cost of doing business).

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

I knew it was a fantasy when I wrote it. I mean, obviously they pay more for lawyers than anything else.

Just amazing how far they can stretch the law without it snapping back on them.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

... for operations whose fundamental business is crime

Oh, so, insurance companies are "criminal enterpriseS", plural. Gotcha.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You can do deeply unethical things that are legal, such as delay deny defend. If only insurance stopped there it would be a great improvement. It's more likely they cross the line of what's legal as long as there's a chance of profit, even when penalties apply.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

~~If the company were doing that,~~ couldn't they be considered a criminal enterprise?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Was the guy having an aneurysm while writing this?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps due the lack of medical care.