92

I've generally been against giving AI works copyright, but this article presented what I felt were compelling arguments for why I might be wrong. What do you think?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

not supernatural beings

If God was real and literally came down and showed up at the copyright office, would they really deny him the rights to all creation?

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I think that depends on His nationality and where the works were created. Does the US respect copyright claimed in countries that no longer exist (at least in the same form)?

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

This is going to be the kind of thing that builds resentment against humanity among AI persons. Of course the law will lag by perhaps a hundred years before recognizing them as persons, and more likely they’ll fix it themselves instead of waiting for us to fix it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
92 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
271 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS