this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
392 points (95.6% liked)

196

16628 readers
2214 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

oldie meme but needed to bring this back due to recent incidents 😭

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Me when I talk to my wife...

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This is anywhere on the internet.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

yeah :p bit of a hyperbolic statement my fault

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Well, the original post was as well, so fair enough!

[–] socsa@piefed.social 34 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Me: "I like pancakes"

Lemmy: "Only a shitlib western imperialist would think that. Read more Lenin."

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 12 points 6 hours ago

Me: “I like waffles”

Lemmy: “HOW THE FUCK AM I SUPPOSED TO GO MY LIFE WITHOUT PANCAKES YOU OPPRESSIVE INSENSITIVE FUCK”

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

True, properly educated and vetted comrades would prefer blini.

[–] renrenPDX@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What…. This is on par with any kind of internet discourse. It’s pretty much why I hardly ever post prior to Lemmy. It doesn’t matter how well articulated the post, SOMEONE will find the need to correct or clarify unnecessarily.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

it’s really sad because i take great pride and pleasure from reading other people’s thoughts and posts. but when i try to give back, it’s immediately jumped on by dogpilers and “oh you actually meant something else…” people. and when i do the bare minimum to defend myself, they slap back with the “okay buddy, sure” and downvote my defense so it’s invisible to other readers.

needless to say my blocklist is nearing 100 users.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

and downvote my defense so it’s invisible to other readers.

Lemmy isn't an endless torrent of comments. Even downvoted ones get reached.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Wanna get mad? Yesterday drag made a similar post criticising Lemmy, but it focused on the transphobia on the platform. -46 downvotes. Thread full of transphobia anyway. On Blahaj. https://lemmy.nz/post/17415487

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 32 minutes ago

hmm i honestly just don’t understand what the post is trying to say. it’s a bit unclear to me but im sorry there was confusion and hard feelings going on

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Prior to the US election, there were many people that did this exact thing- only it was “oh yeah? Well… you support genocide!

They’re rarely here anymore. Which is what was predicted that typically warranted their response to begin with.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 24 points 8 hours ago

Bravery is leaving both the ifunny and imgflip watermarks.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 39 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

-"Russia should not invade a sovereign country, murder its citizens and deport their children."

-"Umm, actually, the US were doing crimes in Syria and you should not support them."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I see more Motte-and-bailey fallacy.

I see less "I like pancakes" and more "I think pancakes are superior to waffles" from the first commenter.

Then the second commenter responds, "So you hate waffles?"

Then the first commenter retreats to "No, I just like pancakes. Why are you assuming what I'm saying? Don't you understand I'm being nuanced?"

Also, nuance is one of the more recent words to have a new usage like literally, which can now mean figuratively. When people say their argument is nuanced they mean it is good or correct. It reminds me of the use objective to describe a person to pretend they don't have biases to incorrectly validate their arguments.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

me: lot of pancakes out there

you: actually i see more waffles

(with peace and love haha you make excellent points i just couldn’t resist)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

On Lemmy it's more like:

"I don't like pancakes."

"Oh, so I suppose that waffles are perfect huh??"

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 33 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, it’s more like “you should delete windows now and get Linux”

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I agree that conversations sometimes end up being about Linux, which is unfortunate. People seldom recommend installing BSD or other free systems, which is a shame. The lesson here is that we should all install OpenBSD.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] odium@programming.dev 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 5 points 6 hours ago

Oh, so you hate Plan9 huh?

[–] Jomega@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

One time I said AI porn was unethical (because it is) and people here thought I was calling for a ban on all porn. At no point did I say that porn was unethical as a rule, and if I did believe that I wouldn't have mentioned AI at all.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It'd be nice if we could regulate porn in good faith. Every attempt to regulate it in the US has been an obvious attempt to shut it down, but it should be regulated like anything else. Sex toys, too. Lots of questionable substances are used in sex toys that probably shouldn't be inserted into the human body.

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Sex toys are not regulated in the us?! There are a ton of regulations in the EU unfortunately not the same in all countries but some even classify them as medical devices. There is also the standard ISO 3533 "Sex toys — Design and safety requirements for products in direct contact with genitalia, the anus, or both" which is not required at the moment? is still used as a guideline.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 3 hours ago

None beyond that ISO standard, which yes, is advisory. If it can be shown to be dangerously unsafe, it's subject to a recall, but that's only going to happen if the batteries tend to explode or something like that. There's lots of unsafe types of plastic that get through.

https://www.compliancegate.com/sex-toys-regulations-united-states/

The United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is an independent agency of the US government, overseeing the safety of consumer products. It develops and enforces safety standards in the United States. It also conducts research related to hazards and risks to the public caused by consumer products.

The CPSC has not yet developed a specific safety standard for sex toys. However, importers and manufacturers are required to report to the CPSC if their product could create a substantial risk of injury to the public, for example, because of a manufacturing defect or a design issue.

In practice, an unsafe sex toy is subject to a recall, regardless of whether it is covered by mandatory safety standards. Hence, importers or manufacturers of sex toys should ensure that their products are safe, for instance by complying with relevant voluntary safety standards.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

how dare you say we piss on the poor

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

i never said that! i only piss on the MOON

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

YOU HAVE 23 HOURS BEFORE THE PISS DROPLETS HIT THE FUCKING EARTH

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Who's more poor than the moon, though? It not just doesn't have any money, it's not even ALLOWED to own money!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 43 points 11 hours ago (9 children)

A large portion of the world is experiencing political polarization. I see the same things happening on Lemmy happen on other social media websites.

The “if you don’t agree with me you must have the exact opposite opinion” approach to debate seems to be more a problem of the participants than the platform.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

i feel this problem might be worse on the fediverse because of the political communities that form around instances, e.g. .ml, .blahaj.zone, .world

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Pretty much every time I dare to say anything negative about Russia or China I'm swarmed with illiterate tankie lemmings who jump into the conclusion that criticising one empire automatically means supporting the other empire.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›