this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
836 points (98.6% liked)

Comic Strips

12944 readers
2938 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Trantarius@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 18 hours ago

Atkinson hyperlegibile is hands down the best for reading ebooks. It was designed for visually impaired people, but it's also super easy on the eyes for everyone else. I read so much faster and more comfortably with this that I can't imagine using anything else.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

The subtle kerning of it, the tasteful thickness of it, my god it's even got serifs.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

My favorite font foundry is https://indestructibletype.com/. Beautiful typefaces, open source, and many different weights. The designer also has some good sex ed videos on his YouTube channel.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If your font type was a person:

GIMME AN A

They did, in fact, nail it.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Tiefkuehlkost@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Text looks good, but man the Number hight looks cursed and kinda random.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

they're called lowercase numbers and they're designed to look good in paragraph text. for example if you're reading this comment, mentioning the year 1997 suddenly puts four full height characters as if I typed one word in all caps, while in lowercase numbers it would look more like if I typed the word iggy (1 is x height while 9 and 7 have descenders like g and y).

they're not designed to be used in math or for longer number sequences. for that you have the full height (uppercase) numbers that most typeface should still have.

0123456789 in lowercase have the same heights as oizgjpbyfq - just as random as that word's letter heights are. which is not random at all, you're just not supposed to use it like that.

[–] Tiefkuehlkost@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh that makes sense, thanks for the information. Still would not want to use something thats not universal.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

idk what you mean by universal; this is a typographical choice. the only reason you see more uppercase numbers everywhere is because of typewriters and by extension computers. I don't think people make a point of lining numbers up with cap height in handwriting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Their shape is beautiful (from 3 to 9) but why were they not written on the same line?

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Pure elistism. 0 1 and 2 were the original high digits created by imperialist powers that reigned supreme for thousands of years.

After the first number wars, 3-9 started to demand equal rights at the bargaining table.

In order to keep the hierarchy in place, 6 and 8 were empowered as class traitor pawns to subjugate the other lower digits. Hence their perceived elevated status.

Why did 6 hate 7? Because 6 and 8 86'd anyone who didn't fall in line. No one even knows about digit [redacted] anymore.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

lowercase numbers, check my comment above if you're interested

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The most beautiful font ever. Although, this Metropolis is pretty nice, too.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Love the lowercase, hate the uppercase. Look at what they did to my boy B.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really love the numbers, though.

I've discovered that it's a horrible screen font, though: far too spindly to be easily readable. I still use it, but I have to make it larger than usual and bold, and it's still a little hard to make out sometimes.

Oh, what we sacrifice for aesthetics.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

0 seems a bit too indistinguishable from O, but otherwise I'm also a big fan of the numbers.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 9 hours ago

I think the font heavily reuses glyphs. 0 probably literally is the same glyph as O. I'm positive 9 is just a rotated 6 (I guess that's pretty common, although it's really obvious in Poiret).

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I love Century Gothic and most of Futura, though I'm not sure how I feel about Futura's lowercase j.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What're you looking at?? His gut?? He's working on it!

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have the urge to drink martini and rewatch The Great Gatsby.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And Jeeves & Wooster, and Poirot.

Poirot is obviously the inspiration here, in style and name.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

actually disappointed that poirot doesn't have that font

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] odious@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

I like Ubuntu Mono but I’ll admit it’s a bit flashy for a code font.

[–] milliams@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a good job they explained the joke.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wasn't there some theory about comics being improved by removing the final panel?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Definitely. I was going to post this:

Remove 4th panel.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

The "ew" saved it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 21 hours ago
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know a person who professionally does something with text. She made it her mission to format every single email in ComicSans, bold, italic, red, centered.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See that's funny. My boss using comic sans light blue for emails explaining highly technical shit to non-technical users? Funny in theory, absolutely not in action.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait, is this Comic Sans? Some just want to see the internet burn

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 22 hours ago

Sure, but we use Papyrus, not Comic Sans.

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like the comic sans hate did die down in recent years and justly so. It was overhated IMHO. It's an ok font for certain uses. The problem was mostly people misusing it to serve roles it was never designed for.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 4 points 1 day ago

It will look good in a children story-book. Not in a professional email.

[–] eighty@lemmy.one 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I saw a meme where it was "big brain" to use it for their IDE/notepad so I tried it out and my god it's not even funny how legible and easy on the eye it is.

[–] fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Verdana is my fucking jam. Good spacing and very legible at different font sizes. My only two gripes: Lower case "l" (L) being a straight line and the number 0 has no cross through it. Not major though, cause they're still pretty distinct from similar characters.

load more comments (6 replies)

Universal Grotesk

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m more of a sans serif kinda guy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›