this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
34 points (97.2% liked)

askchapo

22814 readers
509 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Religion doesn’t count. We’re on Lemmy, so neither does communism.

(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SexMachineStalin@hexbear.net 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

The SANDF should intervene in Gaza at least to airdrop food and medical aid from Egypt, as well as provide armed security for convoys. IDF aren't going to attack a South African MRAP and Gauteng is literally too far away to bomb.

South Africa should also criminalise the SAZF, SAJBD and SAFI, in addition to the Herzlia and Theodore Herzl schools for providing material and financial support to the IDF directly. Aside from the obligations set by the ICJ ruling and more vocal demands for South Africa to take more punitive actions against the Nazi entity a continent apart, the listed organizations are also directly advocating for terrorist attacks against other South Africans, especially humanitarian workers and refugees, including those who already escaped to safety in South Africa.

I personally recommend a lawsuit against the SAJBD in the area of R2 Trillion ZAR

[–] SoloboiNanook@hexbear.net 22 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

For this place?

Cars are badass. They make crazy noise and you can do sick ignorant shit in them. Slamming one around a parking lot whipping shitties and spending ur paycheck to see how even dumber it can get fuckin rules.

It's bad to be forced to have a car. Nobody should HAVE to have one. Cars themselves are cool as fuck.

[–] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 10 points 5 hours ago

Mashing the gas and breaking the tires loose is just... Fun.

It's bad in so many ways, but damn if it isn't a good ass time. Something primal about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 31 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The godfather does insist upon itself

[–] Esoteir@hexbear.net 19 points 6 hours ago

im with peter on this one

peter-running

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 22 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Most people - including Marxist thinkers and people here on Hexbear - do not understand what idealism is and subscribe to a critique of it that says that Platonism and most versions of religious idealism - probably the most popular examples of idealist schools of thought - are not idealist schools of thought.

People also seem to unfortunately like to come to a conclusion first, and then try to fit the facts to match that conclusion, like when people try to argue that the PRC's economy is currently socialist despite it featuring significant private property (and, thus, profit motive). (Going to note here that there is a room to argue that it isn't capitalist on the grounds of the capitalist class not being sufficiently dominant, which I am not equipped to discuss right now, and why I do not call it such.)

[–] impartial_fanboy@hexbear.net 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

like when people try to argue that the PRC's economy is currently socialist

The easiest counter to this is that the PRC itself does not consider its economy to be socialist.

People also seem to unfortunately like to come to a conclusion first, and then try to fit the facts to match that conclusion

Exhibit A: The whole "Western Marxist" debate. A whole lot of people will look for someone else to blame before they blame themselves or their group.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have any resources or examples that might clearly demonstrate what idealism is and isn't?

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Right now, I don't have any sources ready, and I know for certain that the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article on idealism explicitly excludes non-recent branches of idealist schools of thought.

There are at least two definitions of ontological idealism (and two corresponding ones for ontological materialism) that I have seen. One of which characterises idealist schools of thought as positing that (some) non-material things have some sort of primacy over material things (note that non-material things are not limited to thoughts). Another definition is broader and simply requires idealist schools of thought to posit that non-material things exist (while the corresponding definition for materialism requires those schools to posit that only material things exist).

Contrary to popular perception, idealism does not require you to believe in magic, including that we can psychically change matter. Simply, for example, subscribing to the idea that math does not depend on matter is idealist.
Also, while religious idealism (most prominently Christian idealism) does require you to believe in magic, it also doesn't require one to believe that it is thoughts that have any sort of primacy over matter.

I am also pretty sure that I'm not alone in considering relevant disagreements to be at least mostly linguistic in nature. I have heard that Wittgenstein said something to the same effect, but have not checked.

[–] SweetLava@hexbear.net 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

i personally thought the most common form of idealism was summed up as this: "humans cannot perceive reality perfectly, they perceive things to their human limit and see appearances of things"

or, alternatively: "humans have experiences that trascend humanity itself and can't be fully understood by humans"

For Marx in particular, he saw any theory divorced from practical experience as a slipperly slope towards idealism - I'm still working through this argument myself, though, and I believe I misunderstood his point. I'm not very strong on my Young Hegelian critiques, truthfully

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

i personally thought the most common form of idealism was summed up as this: "humans cannot perceive reality perfectly, they perceive things to their human limit and see appearances of things" or, alternatively: "humans have experiences that trascend humanity itself and can't be fully understood by humans"

It is definitely not that. The points about imperfection of perception are not relevant to either of idealism and materialism themselves.

For Marx in particular, he saw any theory divorced from practical experience as a slipperly slope towards idealism

I have not encountered Marx saying so, but that would be silly, as idealism isn't some sort of a detachment from practice, and I would argue that there are no serious incompatibilities between idealism and Marxism (at the very least, nobody has managed to bring any of such to my attention, so far).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 26 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe not mooost controversial, but the legend of korra is not only worse than ATLA, but it is pretty much garbage. Lib garbage, too.

[–] crime@hexbear.net 21 points 6 hours ago

missing the crucial appeal of the series, which is that lesbians will watch anything with lesbians in it

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 6 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

season 3 was good and I liked the flashback episodes in season 2

1 didn't understand it's own politics and 4 was abysmally bad

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GrosMichel@hexbear.net 15 points 6 hours ago

The Sega Dreamcast is a gen 5 console.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I liked season 2 of true detective. And i loved Dark Souls 2 (at least the Scholar of the First Sin version)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aquilae@hexbear.net 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Oooh I can smell a struggle session coming up

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A few years back, after a series of struggle sessions, admins actually had a "no 'what's your most controversial opinion' rule". But things have chilled out heaps since then, and I can't yet be bothered to report.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Still not going to repeat my most controversial opinions; they're a bit of an iceberg, even excluding the bad takes that weren't solid stances.

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago

My most controversial takes are stuff that Hexbear gets behind. Either that, or there's a specialised comm here that supports my opinion (in opposition to the majority of people in Burgerland).

[–] gramxi@hexbear.net 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I like the fakenews comm and its original posters

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HiImThomasPynchon@hexbear.net 14 points 6 hours ago

Only dogs should have the right to vote.

[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I liked the HBO Watchmen series despite the fact that Alan Moore definitely hates it.

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 5 points 4 hours ago

I remember enjoying it for the most part

[–] PointAndClique@hexbear.net 20 points 7 hours ago
[–] ProjectCyberSin@hexbear.net 11 points 6 hours ago

Outdoor cats

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 11 points 6 hours ago

Bottomless Pit is Death Grips' worst album. It feels like it brings nothing new to the table, like if you hear that album first and The Money Store second, you'd think Money Store shows great progress.

[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 2 points 4 hours ago

reading is dumb

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›