News

3 readers

4 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago

Mastodon makes a major move amid Musk’s multiple messes (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Haus@kbin.social to c/news@kbin.social

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Federated social network adds n00b-friendly features to the 'Fediverse'

top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] JelloBrains@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The search function is nice and really appreciated. But, from my experience, the biggest problem with Mastodon is how much work you have to put into curating a feed, something traditional social media has done some of the work for you. I mean it's fairly simple once you get the hang of it, but a lot of people are used to having their hand held.

Also, I'm not looking to piss people off, but I think in terms of the users on the platform it is extremely progressive, and non-progressive people will be less likely to engage with that.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Or will change that. I suspect in their infancy most of the popular corporate owned social media platforms probably had a more left leaning clientele to begin with.

[–] xc2215x@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mastodon has a big opportunity now with Elon wanting everyone to pay. These search ideas are good.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We should start a pool on how long until the corporate enshittification of Mastadon starts.

[–] palordrolap@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Mastodon is a lot harder to enshittify being as it's decentralised and uses an open protocol.

If it looks like an instance has gone down the path of corporate enshittification, other instances will stop federating with it.

The software itself could be a target, but it's open-source. Even the original instance created by the software creators (mastodon.social), turns to the dark side, someone will inevitably fork the last open-source version of the software and other instances will then update from the most popular fork.

As long as the underlying protocol remains the same, it doesn't really matter what happens.

Heck, kbin is totally different software but uses the same protocol to federate with the various Lemmys, other kbins, and, yes, Mastodon instances too.

Consider what happened a number of times with Reddit where various groups left and used the last open-source version of the software to set up their own Reddit clones. It wasn't particularly successful for them, but one or two of them are still out there.

If there had been a large number of them all sharing content and posts like Mastodon etc., maybe they would have been more popular. (For better or worse).

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully this helps. Mastodons greatest issue IMO is content and author discovery.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

A Fediverse-wide problem stemming from its decentralized nature (and perhaps the devs not prioritizing it early).

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

The big addition in this edition is a rebuilt search facility. That matters, because it's something users expect to just work. Mastodon 4.2 has therefore made it possible to search for users using by words in their bio and their names. "The most exciting news is that for the first time, you can now search for posts," Rochko wrote

That's the main point of the article. Damn, when did clickbait become so ubiquitous?

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, the man who says he plans to colonize Mars can't find a way to stop obviously dodgy social media signups.

tbf, colonizing Mars is an engineering problem, whereas social media is a sociological problem.

(I'm like 70% joking)

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Colonizing mars is a stupid thing to do pretty much full stop.

Mars cannot be terraformed. It has no meaningful magnetic field. That's a dead end for a planet's ability to retain a useful atmosphere and ward off cosmic radiation. You'll have to live in shielded, sealed pods to survive there, always. In which case you may as well be in space with access to abundant solar energy and less of a gravity well to contend with for your frequent resupply missions. There's barely any advantage to being on Mars compared to orbiting some random Lagrange point or the sun itself. I guess you can make use of some earthworks for civil engineering? Hardly seems worth it.

[–] paper_clip@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's barely any advantage to being on Mars compared to orbiting some random Lagrange point or the sun itself.

Oye Beltalowda.

[–] HappyHarryHadron@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Just started watching The Expanse, it's good shit

[–] smollittlefrog@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

There's also no point in colonizing mars. We have enough uninhabitated desert here on earth. It's not a space problem, it's a cost problem. And building on mars is a lot more costly than building in a desert.

[–] rastilin@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I've read that Mars could retain an Earth-like atmosphere because, while it's stripped away by the solar wind, it would happen over tens of millions of years; any remotely plausible terraforming attempt would be able to replenish it much faster than that.