this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
169 points (94.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36168 readers
1692 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think your average geek used to be like, somewhat academic and erudite and into arcane knowledge and had some level of good faith of wanting to engage in discussion

Now it's all frauds and absolutely braindead elon stans and crypto dipshits and conservative freaks and people who enjoy and defend watching big tech destroy everything.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 6 hours ago

Crypto bros are a subset of the cryptocurrency community. Some of us managed to make enough money to retire, and now we spend our days contributing to open source projects

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 5 points 8 hours ago

That sounds not much different from the tech bros back then. The vast majority of them were always posers. Anyone with any talent has made their money by now and dropped out of the rat race, the rest of them are either in middle management or drunk themselves to death.

[–] Breve@pawb.social 54 points 15 hours ago

Crypto bros aren't the geeks, they're the popular kids who did well by cheating and copying off other people's work. None of them actually helped make anything even vaguely useful, they memorized enough technical jargon to sound convincing and got lucky betting on digital ponzi schemes.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 37 points 15 hours ago

If all you're seeing are crypto bros, it says more about the media you consume. Serious technologists / engineers are out there, keeping the lights on.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 42 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing happened to them. Those guys are still exactly the same.

The difference is that there's a ton of money in that sector now so a bunch of greedy assholes moved in and now look like they're the folks actually doing tech stuff.

Oh also, there's always been a fair amount of legitimately crazy among tech people (we're strange folk) and those voices get more amplification due to the idiots at the top.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 11 points 16 hours ago

It’s been true for a while now that if you speak with confidence people will listen to you.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 229 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

There's a difference between tech geeks and tech bros.

The tech bro is selling you NFT web 3.0 AR experiences, the tech geek might be learning Docker to self host a Lemmy instance, not because he needs to, but because it's fun.

Both have always existed: one was selling you some horrendous domain during the .com bubble, a plot of land on Second Life or even a perfect marriage based on a secret algorithm running on his Commodore 64, the other was busy playing muds and learning how to make free calls by ringing weird tones into a public telephone.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 164 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Steve Wozniak was the tech geek
Steve Jobs was the techbro

[–] doofusmagoo@sh.itjust.works 105 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Aaron Swartz was the tech geek That jackass sp*z is the tech bro.

:(

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Exactly.

Wozniak did the real work, he was an actual computer engineer and programmer.

Jobs was literally the fucking marketing guy who made his entire career about how marketing guys ruin companies.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 19 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Playing muds

This guy fucks 🫡

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 43 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a tale as old as Capitalism. People who geek out about something do it because they enjoy it, then somebody finds a way to improve distribution of their work and suddenly there’s a skyrocket in demand. Vultures swoop in and suck out whatever life might be left in their passionate work to make it profitable, and then all the passion is gone.

“Tech bro” is the term used to describe those vultures. People who try to monetize the shit out of everything with an ounce of human soul in it. Passionate tech nerds are still out there, mostly in FOSS circles, some in hardware hobbyist circles building cool form factors for their own computers.

Honestly, odds are you’ll find passion only in someone who’s not looking to monetize.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 17 hours ago

I think it's important to note the difference between "make a living to keep things going" vs. "I want to make 'fuck you' money."

I have no problem with people who make a good product and seek donations or sell their product at a reasonable price.

Hell, take uBlock Origin. I'd easily pay $10 / month for this but they do not want money. So I do what they request and donate to the people who make the filters.

This is the first year in perhaps a decade I won't be giving to the Mozilla Foundation because they are enshittifying their product. I wrote to them and told them why I won't be donating. I don't know if it will make a difference but I'm keeping an eye on them over the next year.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 99 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

It happens in every industry: the passionate people who got in it for the love of the field get replaced by the people who got in it for the lucrative business opportunity. Experts get replaced by salesmen.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 43 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

The MBAs relentlessly seek power and money. I worked many years for a large hospital system that I watched transform from clinician-run, with nurses, doctors, and social workers in almost all leadership positions, to MBA-run, with people with no clinical experience in almost all leadership positions. Everything just got worse and worse over time as decision after decision was made that compromised clinical integrity in favor of saving a few dollars. I don't work there anymore

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 32 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That accurately describes just about every industry and business in America. MBAs are the most overrated educational path in the world. The characteristics of a leech in human form.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

To be fair, there are some very interesting concepts around large organizations from how they grow to how they communicate and things like that.

That said - yeah.

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

See also:

  • Intel
  • Boeing
  • GM
  • HP

Wall Street Profits Uber Alles

[–] Brodysseus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago

I have a weird optimism that grassroots tech might make a comeback after everything enshitifies. I got on here 6 months ago and it was so refreshing.

[–] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

When things shifted from being proud of server uptimes to being proud of constant push notifications and constant pointless updates, that's when the tide turned. Engineers lost, MBAs won, and now customers suffer. It's all subscriptions and lootbox mentality now.

I'm guessing somewhere around 2010, but it was a gradual relentless process.

Engineers lost, MBAs won

This is sadly so, so true. (from an engineer)

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Speaking of enshittification, I brought my nephew to an arcade last weekend as a birthday treat. I'm not going to get into the whole "the games are just cell phone games on gigantic screens", there are a handful of games that are still fun and worth the tokens to play. But the worst thing I didn't expect to see was this motorcycle racing game. It was your standard sit-and-lean motorcycle game with a throttle etc. But the surprise was that after swiping the card to play, after you choose your motorcycle, you get the option to swipe again for extra boosts. There were micro transactions. In the arcade motorcycle game. I was so mad.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Didn't games have "pay money to get extra lives" since forever?

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Sure, but paying extra for more turbo boosts in the one race that you get to play is something new. Normally if you want extra boosts you need to learn the course or the game. On that same subject, now if you come in 1st place, you don't even get to continue. (old man voice) back in my day, when you game in 1st place you got to go onto the next race. That was the point of getting good at the game.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm a technerd from the late 90s and early 00s. We're all still here living our best lives, making money off the newest hypes, and then going home to chat on IRC and fiddle around with our old, soulful protocols.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This, but be safe. Wrap it up (in TLS)

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 16 points 19 hours ago

Pick your favorite tech company, pick a small team with a "nerdy" engineering mandate, and I'm confident you'll find the academic, geeky science and engineering types you're talking about.

They probably aren't very vocal though, because 1) there's a huge PR/marketing budget which is responsible for being the face of the company, and 2) well...these are nerdy STEM folks who probably like their job because they get very well compensated to be nerdy STEM types, and not because they're fanboys/girls.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Tech bros like Bill Gates used open source communities like an all-you-can-monetize buffet to build a closed operating system. The rest is history.

[–] False@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (12 children)

What open source was in Windows?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Tech geeks have actual autism.

Tech bros microdose so they can pretend they have autism.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 19 hours ago

You left out the autists who microdose so they can see into the matrix

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

how do I get someone else tested for autism

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago

Start leaving information about trains out for them and see if they bite

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

It’s kind of a joke, but ask about how they arrange their sock drawer.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

What I think a lot of people fail to put together, is that this is the end-game of the early ideologies of the internet. The ideologies of the tech nerds now are directly descended from earlier, more decentralized ideologies.

Think about internet piracy and the change from Napster to Bittorrent.

In the tech world, even since the early days, tech was seen as a way to route around bad laws. In the early days, copyright laws were viewed as overly draconian (they are, but that's not the point), so piracy flourished by routing around the legal framework.

What has happened is the power and wealth of some people with those ideologies have grown so big, they now view all laws that prevent them from doing whatever the hell they want as "bad laws to route around." That's why you have Musk buying Twitter and forcing his opinion's down everyone's throat (routing around traditional media). That's why you have Jack Dorsey dumping his money into Nostr, because he thinks the worst sin on the internet is censorship (routing around attempts to rein in disinformation/misinformation).

It can be seen at OpenAI where they knowingly used books3 to initially train their AIs, which was well known to have been sourced from piracy. OpenAI doesn't care about the provenance of the data as long as they can legally route around the copyright issue and make a fuckton of money in the process.

Anyway, it's a deeply libertarian ideology that was accidentally spurred from earlier, more anarchist ideologies, within the tech community. I would peg tech nerds from the 90s as more anarchist, and tech nerds of the modern era as having bought into the technolibertarianism that began to grow out of it.

Like Steve Wozniak is your standard real tech nerd from the 70's who was the actual engineer behind Apple products, while Steve Jobs was literally the marketing guy yet only the marketing guy got remembered.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

apple started with stuff done by woz. googles algorithims came from their founders. gates bought but put a lot into it. hardware companies where engineering firms. google is the only one where its product was not bought and owned by the user (mostly) but they basically set the stage for flipping the whole thing on its head with the user being the product. this further set the stage for the idea is that if you get the people into your ecosystem then it will be to hard to compete as people are lazy and don't want to change. this lead to emphasis not being on the tech but instead on building the monopoly.

load more comments (4 replies)

We still exist, but you gotta look. Tech has gotten a lot more mainstream since the 90s.

load more comments
view more: next ›