this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
691 points (99.0% liked)

News

23860 readers
3110 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 201 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Picture conservative white southern men who never got their GED trying to frantically Google what a VPN is, because they're missing their interracial porn before the Klan meeting that night.

[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 68 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Interracial gay porn. FTFY

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 171 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess the South is going to have a harder time rising now.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago

Welp. back to working on them thar siblings and relatives then.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 106 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The party of small government

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 94 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

This is asinine, even when internet access to porn didn’t exist people had so much porn, and they’ll continue to get it. All this does is shift the business elsewhere.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 74 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah pornhub seems pretty legitimate and safe these days.

All these bans do is force people to go to sketchier websites which don't have as thorough vetting process for their videos and likely have a lot more illegal / harmful content.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

It highlights that their elected officials are messing with something they like. It is also a lot safer for the business to block a geographic area than deal with PII.

If they operate in those states they need to obtain proof of age. I don't exactly know how that works, since I haven't had to do it, but I imagine it is something like uploading a driver's license picture. If you have all that personal information you have to protect it, or risk information disclosure and lawsuits. A porn favorites list and personal identity info together in the same system is just asking to be hacked.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 93 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Remember when conservatives complained about the nanny state?

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Always just an excuse to get rid of the things they don't like, such as social security.

They absolutely want to regulate you on a federal level. They just want to decide which things get enforced/funded, and which should be left to the states/community/church, or what they really mean, nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phar@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 weeks ago

Republicans love big government, they just want the same or more power concentrated amongst less people. They're all about that shit.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 74 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

So people better understand: Pornhub did not get banned by law. There is a law that requires porn sites to verify age with IDs in many southern states. Instead of complying Pornhub location banned themselves.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 88 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You left the most important part out; why is PornHub not complying? Understanding the situation requires knowing the very real concerns about privacy and data security as compliance requires keeping copies of IDs on file for verification.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 78 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

IOW: Pornhub refuses to attempt to secure the PII of everyone who wants to visit the site. It's not within their scope and any website that agrees to do this bullshit is suspect as fuck.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Afaik Pornhub is based in Québec, which has data privacy/protection laws through law 25 (French, will need to translate it). I've had some experience with it on some projects in the last few years, would not surprise me if that was contributing to the decision as well. I'm assuming they would still need to adhere to law 25 and whatever local laws in locations they operate in, could totally be wrong there.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pedroapero@lemmy.ml 47 points 2 weeks ago

This rule is a trap. They are supposed to do it but there is no way to do this reliably (not even mentioning privacy issues).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

lol .... as if .... I'm sure there is a boom in subscriptions for VPN services in the south at the same time .... especially for every political office holder at every level of government

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ha! You seem to be under the impression that the laws are enforced for them also.

"Laws for thee, not for me!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

And yet when we pointed out that Project 2025 talked about banning porn, a lot of people didn't think it was serious. This is just one way that such an idea can play out.

I don't think porn could ever be fully banned - prohibition doesn't work. (Besides, I already made a promise to create erotic art specifically in order to spite any such enacted law.) But considering how modern porn and its variety has enabled many people to acquire niche preferences, this is still going to trigger a challenging time for a lot of people.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If this plays out like it's played out in other countries the only people who will actually be prevented from accessing pornography will be lawmakers, because they'll be the only people not tech savvy enough to be able to circumvent the restrictions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 55 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Others have mentioned already - the issue here isn't porn sites being banned, but states mandating age verification and the privacy concerns related to that verification.

I'm not sure I even care about an age limit being enforced for pornography, but doing so will necessitate de-anonymizing internet traffic (further) and make private browsing less feasible. There are other laws being proposed that would require personal identity verification on social media sites, too, and that would be the death of lemmy and any other anonymous shitposting sites that are left.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 24 points 2 weeks ago

Regardless of any shitposting, just being forced to hand your ID docs to your Facebooks, Reddits, Twitters, etc with their track record of processing data is not an attractive proposition.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If only someone could invent a VPN. One of these days...

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 46 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

VPNs will be declared terrorists' tools within the month.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can they access the hundred other porn sites?

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Looks like the big-name ones are either complying with the ID law or self-blocking like Pornhub. Smaller ones are operating as normal for now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

From the article:

As of today, Florida, Tennessee, and South Carolina join the list of 17 states that can’t access some of the most popular porn sites on the internet, because of regressive laws that claim to protect children but restrict adults’ use of the internet, instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

But how will the south watch all that transexual porn they love so much?

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (22 children)

Side subject, sorry for my aside: I'm starting to really get annoyed at the censorship on my instance.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Weird, I'm a .world account too and I see what the comment said just fine

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago

I hope PH is putting a list with the names of the representatives who are responsible for this on the home page for those states. With phone numbers and mail addresses of the reps offices.

[–] BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

Literally 1984

One of the things that stuck out to me while reading in school was the sexual frustration part

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

The Red States are turning into the fucking PRC. Carry on...

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For every 1 porn site that has to comply with US regulations there are 100 that don’t and they won’t implement any IP blocks. Absurd that they really think this will have any effect.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

it's a foot in the door for online surveillance. has little to do with porn

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago

But now they can legitimate all sort of bullshit measures to enforce that law. It will have an effect. Just not the one you expected.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So what I'm reading is that VPN business is going to continue to thrive. But that also is an age limit hurdle, I suppose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

e621 was blocked in my state and... then they realized the law wasn't being enforced and unblocked themselves

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

So… wait. How will conservatives watch all their sister porn now?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago

We need a modern day Larry Flynt.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 18 points 2 weeks ago

Canada saw what was happening in the US South and decided the they need a friend. Canada is the process of passing their own "Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act".

I feel like if there was some type of course that would teach young people about sex and porn in a healthy manner. We could call it "sex education". This would be far better use of tax payers money instead of knee jerk bans and overreaching privacy violations.

load more comments
view more: next ›