AnarchoAnarchist

joined 2 years ago
[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In the '90s people were still talking about how Vietnam started off as the Democrat's war. Democrats also tended to be the party that talked about intervention, being the world's policeman.

H.W. and Reagan started plenty of conflicts but the average American saw no impact from these conflicts. They couldn't point to Granada on a map, and Desert Storm was just a fun show on CNN. These conflicts were quickly forgotten and through most of the 90s Republicans were able to position themselves as a party of peace. In 2000, George W Bush's campaign focused on limiting "foreign entanglements" and not acting as the world's police.

It's always been a lie from both parties, but even though it's a lie it's still the kind of message that wins elections.

I've been looking for sources that back me up and I'm starting to think that this impression I have, is less objectively true. I definitely remember in the lead up to the Iraq War, several people reminding me the Republicans had not gotten us into the quagmire of Vietnam or Korea, but rewatching the presidential debates of 2000, it's really hard to find a place where Bush and Gore actually differ on foreign policy.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

They're going to try to maneuver to the right of Trump. And then be mad at us when they manage to lose a gimme election in the midterms.

When I was very young in the '90s, the Democrats were the party that got us into war. Republicans were able to sit back, preach neutrality and isolationism. They could rightfully say that "we don't get involved in foreign quagmires, Korea and Vietnam were Democrat wars" while positioning themselves as a party of peace. Of course that was a lie, but it was a lie that resonated with a lot of people.

Starting in 2004, the Republicans became the party of war. They were the ones who got us into the most recent foreign quagmires. Democrats had an amazing opportunity to frame themselves as the party of peace, The party of no forever-wars. Something that they were somewhat successful in during the Obama years. Even though we know that it was a lie, it was a lie that resonated with people.

Watching the Democrats give up this amazing position, is like watching The Washington Generals lose a basketball game to a pack of stray dogs. It's infuriating. I don't expect the Democrats to do the right thing, I don't even expect them to do the smart thing, but if you can't run up the score in a situation like this what is the point of organizing yourself into a party?

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Skill issue.

All my partners have remarked how quick I am in bed. And I don't even know what Pilates are.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

I foresee a split in the Trump coalition.

Everyone over 45, the old school neocons, evangelicals, Reagan Republicans, they will end up lining up behind their wartime president.

The Theo Von podcast Republican, young America Firsters, and a good chunk of the straight up online Nazis, will push back. This might end up costing Trump the midterm, depending on how Democrats handle their messaging. But it will have no impact when JD Vance decides to run for president in 2028.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

The powerless tankies are really to blame for Israeli terrorism and unprovoked wars.

Israel was gonna lay down her weapons until someone posted PPB and forced them to shoot that Iranian hospital. They were gonna stop the blockade on Gaza but someone posted a meme about Xi and now they have to shoot starving people for the crime of wanting food.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago

Futurama beat them to it.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago

Iran has been pounding the shit outta Haifa so resupply by sea might be more difficult than it would normally be.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yakub is not sending his best.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Also cut offs all food, water, fuel, medicine, and power to the region. Your family that is being held hostage isn't safe as long as they can access medical supplies or the occasional meal.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

What do you mean by "what", "do", "you", and "mean"?

Also I hate postmodernism.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 4 points 4 weeks ago

Sherlock Holmes, but in the middle of one of his cocaine benders.

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Bro, they get conditional support at best. They are literally monarchists.

view more: ‹ prev next ›