[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I agree she is at fault for spreading harmful and fucking racist misinformation online. At the same time though it must be wild to have a president candidate pick it up and run with it. It's a shame it took this kind of experience to make her see the potential harm of her actions.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Foreign weapons are already being used with impunity by one side in this conflict. If that's your criteria for WW3 you should probably have marked it off some time ago.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

What qualifies someone to be a judge is simply redefined to be what is popular. A judge should therefore no longer follow the law, but make the ruling most in line with what is popular. Under a voting system that is the sole qualifier.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You mean $85b of lost revenue for the innocent and much beloved oil companies, car parking companies and toll companies. Get back to the office, plebs!

For real though when the WFH started it was so great to see a lot more local business happening too beyond just people saving time and money (which is also a huge positive of course). My local cafes and restaurants did really well.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

Saddam has some incredible crush resistance, we should start making entire submarines out of whatever material that is.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I see....but wouldn't that cost rich people more than zero dollars?

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes I agree, and just because there is a methodology doesn't make the result not arbitrary. Can you explain what number four means? How do I assess it, what's a 0, what's a 5 and what's a 10? How does number 2 relate to bias, isn't that a factuality rating thing , why is it in the bias rubric? It's a joke, each rating is totally arbitrary as there is no definition of what each one means beyond some vague description of the category. It's essentially pick a number, feels based.

I have worked with qualitive rubrics before and this one is barely worthy of the name honestly. Two people could take this rubric away and come to completely opposite conclusions based on their own biases.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

Hide ya cats, hide ya dogs....hide ya gerbils, 'cause they eatin' everybody out here

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

He wants a perfect body. He wants a perfect soul.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

That's pretty metal

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I seem to remember one of the GTA games (maybe San Andreas?) had a stand up set from I think Ricky Gervais as something that would play on the TVs.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

If you're still worried, just avoid practicing solo.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Aurenkin

joined 1 year ago