EsheLynn

joined 2 years ago
[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Who purchases the uniforms? You mentioned impoverished kids being made fun of, but the parents have to buy the expensive, overinflated uniforms as well. Wouldn't that put more strain on less well off families, having to buy specific clothes for their child's attendance, each year for each child?

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Pretty much. If they made a "Pokemon Fitness" that tracked steps or heart rate and calories burned, it would be the same thing. "Your steps were converted to fitness energy! Here are the Pokemon you met in your walk!"

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's not a game, it's a gamified tool. It's a sleep tracking app with gameplay elements to keep one interested.

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago

I'm so happy this distraction tactic is working and everyone is talking about a goddamn laptop instead of the actual court case.

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

Different strokes for different folks

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

They wouldn't be paying one person more based on where they live. They would be paying a fair rate based on a formula using miles of commute and current gas prices. Everyone would be paid the same rate. If someone works less hours, is it unfair that the person that works more gets paid more? No, they are being compensated for time, just as the commuters should be compensated for their time and maintenance on their vehicle.

Is it fair that the people that live farther away should have to pay more to come to work that those who live closer? Its not fair to me who has to pay sooo much more in maintenance and gas!

Previous smartass paragraph aside, paying both more doesn't solve the problem. This isn't about who is getting paid more. It's about giving everyone the same tools to succeed. And if I am paying 100$ more a month, I'm making 100$ less a month.

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No, not at all. Just sad cuz nostalgia is all. Cool he wants to travel and meet fans of him and the franchise, it's just.... Again, kinda feels like a bit of a travelling sideshow attraction is all. Maybe it would be better if he retired is my point of view. It would bother me to be reduced to what feels like a circus act or county fair attraction. "Come see the Bearded Lady, after that, get Charles Martinet's autograph!" Ya know?

Edit to add: at the same time, I do get that this is apparently Martinet and Nintendo wanting to continue to work together. Hell, maybe I should take my nostalgia glasses off. He gets to travel the world on Nintendo's dime, and get paid to do it. Probably not too bad of a retirement I guess.

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It's just a shame he's been downgraded to what appears to be a sideshow piece. I mean, if he's happy doing it, more power to him. He's been Mario for, like, 20 years? Good luck to the next Mario. Those are some big overalls to fill.

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

I am happy you enjoy your meal plan, but don't yuck my yum

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

If you are going to chess tournaments, you are past the point of getting your ass kicked in chess club. I said it on another thread, but if people are being demeaning and unsportsmanlike, they can get kicked out just as you would any other game. They do it for MTG, YGO and Pokemon TCG tournaments. Bullshittery about trans people aside, this is more of a systemic issue than anything else.

view more: ‹ prev next ›