Should we include breaking points because it includes Ryan and Krystal ball, or exclude it because they co-host with reactionaries?

Mayonnaise on pizza is peak cuisine

Yes, it is I, a secret famous leftist. I'll never say who I am just know that I'm one of your favorites

Oh my God thank you that's literally the only thing that begins to explain why someone would do this, even though it's still complete nonsense

That's always been their pitch, I'm pretty sure it's even discussed in the manifesto when Marx talks about petty bourgeois socialism.

I always assume things like that happened but seeing this specific case is really pissing me off.

Ackshualy that's called freedom, and sometimes you can even have freedom without democracy! (Pinochet emoji)

At the very worst, China operates like a normal private lender (which is obviously better than the strings attached to IMF loans). They just do an incredible amount of lending, because they genuinely want to build up Africa's economy for strategic reasons

This feels like something we could get to believe and, inshallah, follow through with

They had elections, that's all democracy is. Actually doing what the people want is the biggest threat to democracy

The problem with the one you posted specifically isn't even related to anti-communist bias. Here's one statement that gave it a downgrade:

Capitalism brought with it an unprecedented expansion in social mobility, both upward and downward.

Rating: Mostly False

Also, the llm is rating novel analysis (such as "Marx looked at the differences between kings and capitalists") as false, because there isn't much literature that already discusses things in those terms. So, if you don't want the bazinga bot to give you an F, you aren't allowed to say things in new ways that aren't already established in the literature. What a bright future we have

I only saw the green bars highlighted in the graphic, you expect me to actually read the numbers on the axis?