[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I want to second using the website as a pwa. It works quite well.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's also asshole design. Most people are behind some form of nat. It's especially egregious for customers of ISPs who use CGNAT.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I'd kill for a game with the scope of Skyrim where the NPCs truly felt like they were living their own lives.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Because they don't always exist.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah the sad part is that, really, the best we can hope for is a post mortem. Rescue is almost impossible in this situation.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

I mean yes but, you don't have to use it.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

The fact that everyone treats Golem-Picard as True-Picard felt to me like confirmation that, in the ST universe, what makes you you is your mind. Memories, thought patterns, etc... I know it was tv-show hand wavery but the fact that no one mourned the death of their friend, or really ever once questioned the validity of the golem taking his place bothered me a little.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I wonder if there's a technical manual out there that tries to explain it. It seems like energy manipulation is something startrek tech excells at.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

In practice, I agree with you. The transporter scans, disintegrates, and reconstructs the thing being transported. But when the thing being transported is reconstructed at a subatomic level it is effectively identical.

I can imagine the society we see in startrek having already worked through the moral and philosophical implications. I would have loved to see that addressed in an episode tho.

[-] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

I always thought the least believable part of transporters was that they worked without a pad on both ends.

SeeJayEmm

joined 1 year ago