UraniumBlazer

joined 1 year ago
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh.... Oh no....

The lighting looks fake, the acting is bland...

Man they had to ruin HTTYD too, huh...

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Ok, let's see

  • Fox moderator as verticalgong minister
  • Killmonger as underworld minister
  • Impregnator as health minister
  • Hillbilly as vice president
  • Very wrong theorecist as Justice Minister

Bottom text: Trump's next Reich

Is my translation correct?

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Mediums of information delivery change with time. Just because someone doesn't read much doesn't mean that they are idiots.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

This is really exciting! Further development in this definitely means much much cheaper healthcare (socialized or not)

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

UBI and UBS aren't opposites. UBI is the last level of UBS.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow thank you for this meme. The comments in the post above this one were absolute dog shit, and I seriously was on the verge of engaging with them. I didn't engage. Yayyyy

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 65 points 1 month ago (34 children)

Anything but Mastodon/Activitypub, eh? These fellas rlly love sucking on corporate dicks, don't they

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It seems that LIDAR based self driving tech (the one that Waymo uses) is miles ahead than 2d camera based tech (the one that Tesla uses).

I'm really excited for this being implemented for city buses. Currently, in lower density areas, there are two choices - have smaller buses with more frequency, or have larger buses with less frequency. The problem with smaller buses is that you need more drivers. The problem with larger buses is that frequency becomes low, thus disincentivizing usage of public transit.

Self driving city buses would be really cool as driver costs would be 0. This would mean, that smaller buses/vans would be able to run at fixed routes at really high frequencies.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

NOOOOO

I'm so sorry op.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

WOW that's fucked up.

Naah, I was referring more to the headline, as I believe there would be a positive correlation between married women and kids. Banning women to marry = less kids.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 37 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Don't they... have... a... population shortage?

I'm so confused

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's one of their beliefs, sure. However, their economic beliefs are still kinda pro capitalism.

view more: ‹ prev next ›