Defense against being charged of a precime, if one looks at the timestamps, which no is going to do.
Admins, are you seeing these removals, or has c/the_dunk_tank gone rogue?
I have no interest in defending and did not defend the position that the images weren’t “technically CSAM”. Show me where I said that. I didn’t say anything about what CSAM is or isn’t, and I rejected his legal arguments.
Show me what I actually did wrong. Show me my own words, and what is wrong with them.
If I said anything wrong, it was the preamble to my bullet points: “I didn’t see him defending pedophilia.” Which, you’re welcome to argue was in my own ignorance and failure to closely read everything in that sprawling conservation, I did not see. The bullet points themselves I think still stand, despite having been censored.
:shocked-shocked-well-not-that-shocked:
Theory: By virtue of trans people being oft-accused of pedophilia by transmisiacs, they are hyper-aware of it, hypersensitive to it, and well-educated on it, at least compared to a crusty old cishet like me.
But nutomic (an admin) and davel (an admin and hexbear user) has been defending him in the comments.
They should go too, wtf
Why I Left the Left.
I said that I suspected you might be a Global North chauvinist, because brand new users who claim to be communists often turn out to be just that.
The guy is a misogynist; of that I have no doubt and have called him out on it publicly before. His weird take on AI-generated CSAM is a new one for me, though.
Why did @marcie@lemmy.ml accuse me of defending a pedo defender before I was even aware of or commented on the original post or this dunk_tank post? Again, look at the timestamps. Does that sound good-faith behavior to you? I was already getting piled on by several people, who presumably took her at her word, before I even knew anything was happening. The only reason I got involved at all is because my inbox blew up out of nowhere this morning.