drd

joined 4 years ago
[–] drd@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

progress benefits only a select group of already-rich individuals and means loss of jobs and income for everyone else.

This is tough because alternatively, not progressing on automation at the ports benefits a select group of wealthy individuals as well. The ILA's president, Harold Daggett, brings in nearly $1 million a year ($902,000) in salary, and his son Dennis which is the vice president, salary is $703,000. At the United Auto Workers union, with more than four times as many members, UAW President Shawn Fain received just under $200,000 for his eight months on the job last year. . None of the dock workers get paid close to as much.

I think one of the best solutions for this is to offer some sort of retraining for the workers who will be displaced by automation. As with any technological progress, I am sure new jobs will arise. As the article states, we don't really have a consensus on whether port automation will actually decrease jobs. I think the benefits of port automation (environment, worker safety, the end consumer, efficiency, etc) with some sort of worker retraining here really outweighs the cons.

 

KEY POINTS

  • The United States Maritime Alliance, which represents the owners of East and Gulf Coast ports, said in a statement on Wednesday that the union position on automation is currently making a new labor deal difficult to reach, with a January 15 deadline to either reach an agreement or face another strike.
  • USMX says the use of semi-automated cranes, already at many ports, is critical to future supply chain demands.
  • The International Longshoremen's Association, which is not publicly commenting, has said in the recent past that the union wants new contract language to clearly state that "no automation means no automation."
[–] drd@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Again I am talking about automated ports not Amazon sorting facilities, please look into how automated ports work, in fully automated ports there are less workers working directly with machinery than in a standard port. You'll need to provide sources that automated ports are not safer or more efficient. The transportation and movement occupation has the highest number of fatal injuries in my state, not only can it be fatal but it also takes a toll physically as well, we should be helping these workers and automation can help do that.

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Automated ports do not work that way, where employees interact directly with a robot. Instead employees stay at a desk and minimal employees are on the ground. Like I had mentioned, automated ports are safer.

https://youtu.be/P5kO_BnXAwc

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Yes, I work in supply chain. Being a dock worker is a tough grueling job, wouldn't we want to automate that as much as possible? Besides cost, automated ports are both safer and more efficient. I think the ideal scenario would be to grant some sort of retraining.

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (15 children)

I'm not sure how I feel about the no automation clause.

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Ignorance is bliss

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Bogleheads, and the bogleheads guide to investing

https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Bogleheads%C2%AE_personal_finance_planning_start-up_kit

https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Bogleheads%27_Guide_To_Investing

I'm very glad that someone recommended me bogleheads, after reading, I was able to open up a roth and contribute yearly which may be one of the best personal finance decisions I've made.

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

I found the idea interesting, just something to think about as these platforms continue to develop.

309
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by drd@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

With Google's recent monopoly status being a topic a discussion recently. This article from 2017 argues that we should nationalize these platforms in the age of platform capitalism. Ahead of its time, in fact the author predicted the downfall of Ello.

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 41 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The user with an AI copyright notice on every one of their posts is one of my favorite "gimmicks".

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Reddit search has always been quite poor, at least for me. Not sure how AI is going to improve that haha

[–] drd@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

The first time I saw this term used was on twitter, from a somewhat funny twitter troll.

172
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by drd@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

I've posted about this last year. However, during this time they've managed to keep it up and have risen their salaries. The article is an interesting read that goes about their reasoning for paying everyone the same salary.

It's quite rare to see a company pay every employee the same salary, even rarer to have salaries this high. Very interested in how long they'll be able to keep this up.

About the company

Oxide Computer Company is the creator of the world’s first commercial Cloud Computer, a true rack-scale system with fully unified hardware and software, purpose built to deliver hyperscale cloud computing to on-premises data centers. With Oxide, enterprises can fully realize the economic and operational benefits of cloud ownership, with access to the same self-service development experience of public cloud, without the public cloud cost. Oxide empowers developers to build, run and operate any application with enhanced security, latency, and control, and frees enterprises to up-level IT operations to accelerate strategic initiatives. Oxide customers include the Idaho National Laboratory as well as a global financial services firm. To learn more about Oxide’s cloud computer, visit oxide.computer.

4
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by drd@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
 

Although, the company is quite small and the barrier to entry is quite high. It is still very interesting to see companies setting set wages for every employee across the board and being this transparent about it. The article goes into their reasoning for doing this, definitely a good read.

view more: next ›