Yeah AI as a dev is shit, but AI as a more thoughtful auto-complete is actually pretty great.

To me it looks like AIs currently are right at the boundary between being a tool and being a companion. But to be a full companion, they can't be up against the boundary, they need to be well established and tried and tested as a companion to be used repeatedly, so we're still a few decades out from that from what I can tell.

No man's sky is not really the fitting example you think it anymore. Over time the devs put in some work.

Yeah I'm pretty sure the changes he praises have made me not play this game in about 3 years.

And running game studios as a business sound wrong to me. Yes, you need to make money, but it's a creative branch and as soon as you make a pipeline for how you make your games, people will get bored of it, see Ubisoft.

Maybe they had big issues with monetization but what he's talking about doesn't sound healthy at all for the developers and artists working there.

Also I'm still a bit salty that I paid for destiny2 and then they made it free and introduced DLCs. Such a slap in the face.

I know this is a bit late, but copilot is only ok if used for code completion. I switched to the free tier of supermaven a month ago and it's been way more helpful, as it can handle context better. Probably cuts coding in half and takes away a third of debugging.

Asking chatgpt for code has also become better, but imo still not reliable enough to regularly use. Just had some docker code written and it got it wrong 3 times so I gave up on that.

I get your point, AI can only save time if you know exactly what you're doing and it will only be helpful sometimes. But when it is, it's such a time saver.

• nothing. I have autism. There's nothing wrong with me, but I'm obviously a little bit different like other people, which in itself is neither good nor bad.

• because we need a descriptor and that's just what my friends use; we know what we mean with it and what we don't.

Also I'm gonna take those questions at face value, but I'm just gonna note the first question is a bit out out of left field, as no one implied that something's wrong with that.

But I don't wanna assume you are an asshole, so I'm gonna take it as a misunderstanding.

As a German I have a solution:

If we see a Nazi, we punch them. And with see, I mean specific symbols, clothing or other specific identifiers.

If I'm on a trump really, I should be able to punch the people in KKK outfits, the ones with swastikas, and the ones with old flags representing nationalism. And I should also be able to call the rest of them out.

I like this solution. It's a pretty straightforward one.

As long as it still exists, use it for good I guess.

We can't change the system in a day, but we can use the tricks that racists use to nudge it in the proper direction.

And if they don't like it, sure they can go ahead and remove those tricks. Only makes our system more fair and straightforward, which is a good thing.

Let's go through examples:

"He's retarded" - that's a slur, unless it's ironic.

"That was retarded" - not a slur, cause it's kinda taking a dig at an action, not a person.

"I'm retarded" - technically a slur but almost always used with a hint of irony, therefore usually not a slur.

That's how I use the word with my friends. And I have autism, so technically 100 years ago I would have been the resident retard ;)

Funnily enough, I think Jesse and James both had their own episodes where they split from team rocket and somehow become very reasonable.

I loved those because it made the plot a little bit more nuanced and interesting.

Yeah I'm just trying to raise this take every once in a while in the hopes of making systematic progress on this issue at some point ^^

That's very well put

True