[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago

I swear by ddrescue. It's a situation I strive to never be but i've been there before. I used it once to rescue an employees masters capstone project from their dead work laptop.

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

As someone in the thick of it, it has been a nervewracking quarter for mortgage company IT and Infosec teams. There have been several very high profile breaches the last few months.

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago

Oh MediaTracker looks nice, thanks!

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago

.1Q because Q has a tag on it

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

Oh I highly recommend it. As a kid I read a lot of his work and my favorites were the Cask of Amontillado and The Tell-tale Heart. I still love those ones but I feel like I can appreciate the poetry and other stories now.

Another series I've gotten a lot of mileage out of revisiting was Calvin and Hobbes funny enough.

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

Oh nice, have you read any of his other books? I keep meaning to get around to reading Bullshit Jobs.

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 4 points 11 months ago

The shuttle SRB's were really only reusable in the same sense that the engine from a wrecked car can be removed, stripped to a bare block, bored out, rebuilt, and placed into a new car is reusable. Hard to say exactly how long it took to turn around SRB segments, but just the rail transport between Utah and Florida was 12 days each way. SpaceX has turned around Falcon 9 boosters in under a month.

And even with all of that, the most reused reusable segments barely flew a dozen times. There is one Falcon 9 first stage that has now flown 18 times.

You're not wrong about parts having been reused in the past but the scale of what has been done before really doesn't compare to what SpaceX does now.

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do note though that for privacy purposes, a .us domain is not the best idea. You must be a U.S. citizen or business and registrars may try to verify your identity.

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Really depends on your scale and needs, but when we were in the process of transitioning from Ivanti to Intune we had a gap between them. I set up a FOG project server and a couple remote nodes and that worked really well as an interim solution. I actually started using it at home even though I don't really need imaging too often.

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Can I ask why chocolatey and not just installed via policy/company portal? I'm not our Intune guy so I don't know much about the limitations.

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Winget is the best thing added to the windows ecosystem in a long time. I just wish it worked out of the box on Server :(

[-] noUsernamesLef7@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

This is an interesting observation, not really something I have considered. The key difference here is that you are the one in control of those customizations. Whether the customizations are useful or harmful is entirely up to the user, Kagi just gives you the option.

For me at least, the majority of my searches I just want the correct answer to a question or a link to a specific resource I'm looking for. I don't really use it as a content discovery engine. Being able to prioritize sites that I have found through experience to have reliable results and exclude sites that are uninformative or irritating is valuable.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

noUsernamesLef7

joined 1 year ago