pulsewidth

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

B) he doesn't think it's a good idea, Putin does. It will destroy the US's soft power abroad for decades and will give the US's enemies/competitor states a huge leg up in developing nations. China and Russia have already been carving up any parts of Africa that the US doesn't have strong enough diplomatic ties to with asymmetric trade agreements that are sweetened with humanitarian or infrastructure-building 'aid' that's really loans. Expect that to accelerate as the US withdraws these programs and good will evaporates.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The modern anti-vax movement started in the UK with Andrew Wakefield, I wouldn't be quick to square the bulk of the blame with the US.

It's a global phenomenon of the gullable, the willfully ignorany, and the vulnerable (usually through personal loss or trauma) - and the fraudsters who wish to take advantage of them.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Ain't what happened.

Somebody: uses redundant "nobody:" meme format

Someone else: that was redundant, why do people do this?

Flame-baiters: quotes meme back at them

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Shingles is apparently one of the worst chronic pains a person can endure. Adult chicken pox can be deadly.

Worth looking into if you've never been vaccinated against chicken pox. There are options for adult vaccination.

Or don't. Just don't say nobody ever warned you.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

My local public golf course was closed and sold to developers a few years back.

Promises were made to the community of keeping all the trees and lots of green space, as there was vicious community opposition.

The developers have of course instead done what you suggest, and every house is crammed in next to each other just like every other new suburb. Its still in progress but it looks like once they're done you wouldn't even know it used to be a golf course.

This meme is so stupid because it doesn't present an even remotely possible outcome. A far better option is to keep the public golf courses for people to spend time outdoors and to provide homes for wildlife - and then remove regulations limiting building heights to encourage multi-storey development.

Build up, not out - because once green space becomes houses it never changes back.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He's not used to typing in English - Russia keyboard.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Good idea. Pizza's not topical - everyone likes pizzas.

Here's the logo of one of my favourite pizzarias for you to use.

1000038577

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imma quote from the article.

Abramson noted, “It is also a particularly American disease to confuse wealth with intelligence and corporations with those who own them."

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hi, you took the time to respond i feel i owe you the courtesy of a reply.

Reading your website initially I could see a lot of pro gas-vehicle articles and negative EV articles, I didnt really focus on brand - not a fan of Tesla myself, and obviously the CT is a piece of crap. I'll take you at your word that you dont hate EVs but I think if you got a few people to review your site they may also walk away from a quick look through it as 'oh this is an anti-EV site'; lots of loaded language that's positive to gas cars and lots of Tesla bashing. People are not going to read every article and notice that there are a few EVs that you're very fond of before deciding if your page contains useful objective info or if it's a just another biased source.

Regarding your About page (I'm on mobile), if I click the Menu button I get a drop-down that shows an 'About us' with a little down-arrow on it -> if I click 'About us' a menu drops down showing: drop us a line / best of / search / subscribe.

I checked each of those options and couldn't find any info about the organization, or you the writer. Now you say you have an 'about page' so I go back today and I find if I click on the 'about us' drop down menu a second time, it opens a new page. Friend, congrats, you have made a secret About Us page. I have never seen this kind of design in a very long time browsing the internet.

Anyway, now that I'm here there's no credentials or references (some mention of being published on other websites - but no links to those articles), beyond saying you have driven a few hunded thousand miles - and your name is still clearly a pseodonym. Journalists generally build faith in their audience by using their real name, it's a red flag is all.

I hope that clarifies my statements, they were not arbitrary or intended to be malicious or unfair. Even negative feedback can be constructive and that's the spirit of this message.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

What? Maybe you should just stop trying to guess what people think or tell them what they know.

You're welcome to your opinion that it's only been a dozen years of bad behaviour but I do not share it and nor do many, many others. Feel free to have a browse, much of this goes back to 2001, many lawsuits filed in the early 2010s had evidence going back a decade. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google

I'm not responding any further.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

MAGAts are honestly too ignorant to define republic.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I've been using Google since 1998, and everyone loved them because their search indexed sites quicker than others and the search results were more useful than the competition at the time like Yahoo and Altavista and AskJeeves. They started turning nasty as soon as they gained steam & commercial success with AdWords.. around 2003-2004. So no, while they get worae each year they haven't been 'the good guys' for decades.

 

Hi all.

First, thanks for reading. I'm not exactly sure if this is the correct location to raise a concern about a ban/deletion, but I guess it's as good as any.

So:

  1. I dont know which mod it was. Log is redacted?
  2. post deleted & banned from the News@Lemmy.world community
  3. screenshot of modlog attached
  4. screenshot of comment attached.
  5. It was an appreciated post with 106 upvotes 26 downvotes at deletion and several positive responses yesterday. When I came back today (I'm in Australia so timezones..) the comment was deleted and I was banned - and several negative comments have appeared which I would have liked to respond to.

Original post: a news article about Proton Mail.

My post: Essentially I took the time to read the article and included the quotes of what was written by the CEO that was being discussed in the article - as many in the comments had surprised me by jumping straight to him being a literal Nazi. As not a single other commenter had included the quotes to discuss the source, I thought that would be a valuable contribution. I also gave my opinions which you can see in the comment on the modlog, the formatting is messed up so I included a screenshot of the (recreated) comment. https://lemmy.world/modlog/1347

What I didn't notice was that the article writer had omitted the first part of the Twitter post from the CEO in her quotation of him - so I quoted her, and in doing so missed the context that the CEO had actually started "Great pick by @realDonaldTrump" at the start - which does of course change the context of his Twitter post to praise. This was clarified for me in the angry responses. I would have edited my comment and owned my mistake, however stood by the rest of the comment regarding Proton's official follow-up.

So, is that deletion and ban fair?

Update 10 hours later: contacted a mod directly to see if i can find out more about the ban or perhaps get it remedied.

view more: next ›