I just looked on the Google Play store and can't find either of the apps you mention. Do you have a link?
If you don't have any hair, it won't change colour..
(It's a joke, laugh)
Also, not for nothing, the human body changes daily. I'd recommend that you get used to it before you have an unhappy life pursuing battle against the inevitable.
Not sure how I feel about such a bot. I can see potential security issues arising in relation to stored relationships between users and posts.
I'm fairly sure that the price information shown on a Google Search result page is advertising that comes from a different source than the results do.
As far as I know, you could write a plugin for SearXNG to query suppliers and format the output as required.
I think that Google Shopping might be queried in the same way, but I've never looked into it deeply.
No, you didn't "edit" your mistake, you completely changed the meaning of your response which makes anything after it look absurd.
You originally stated that an algorithm was intelligence, the implication being that using your logic, you thought that a calculator was intelligent.
As far as the meaning of AI, you clearly don't understand the landscape surrounding the hyperbolic assertions made by ignorant journalism about the topic.
Machine learning is one aspect of the landscape, useful as it is, intelligence it is not.
LLM emissions on the other hand appear to emulate enough grammatically correct language to fool many people some of the time, leading to their mistaken belief that what is happening is intelligence rather than, at least from their perspective, magic.
(Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -- Arthur C. Clarke)
So, intelligence it is not, Assumed Intelligence is what it is, or autocorrect gone uppity if you prefer, an algorithm either way.
There is nothing new about this phenomenon.
For example, I grew up in the beginning of the home computer boom in the 1980's. Much of that history has completely disappeared because it was thought to be safely stored on audio cassettes and floppy discs.
Because we learnt nothing from that, the next popular storage medium, CD, lost much of the 1990's because as it turns out, they too are not indistructible.
In case you think that this is limited to home computers, today we couldn't build, let alone launch a Saturn V rocket and send it to the moon, even though we know that this happened many times. Why? Because we don't have the tapes and those that we do, can't be read by any equipment we have, not to mention undocumented skills, knowledge, experience and processes.
History has always been written by the survivors.
So .. write it down and survive!
Ignorance is bliss..
A.I. means Assumed Intelligence, despite what you might have read elsewhere. Using it to do "research" is how you're going to get first hand experience with so-called "hallucinations".
But you do you..
As opposed to Arabic speakers in the other party?
I'm an industry professional in ICT with 40 years experience.
I've come to form the view that industry certification is a vendor lock-in process created solely for the purpose of generating a guaranteed income stream for that vendor.
If your employer wants to spend its money on certification, by all means go for it as a learning experience.
If you have to pay for it yourself, I've yet to see any evidence that they represent a return on investment of any kind in your career.
That's not to say that learning should be abandoned, quite the opposite. In this industry, if you're not learning, you're going backwards.
Stay curious, read verociosly and try to figure out how stuff works and more importantly, how it breaks.
Also, make this app hide the 14 page story at the beginning of the recipe and give it the ability to translate between units for weight, volume and temperature.
Mathematics and Politics.
There are many more people who are "working class" than rich. The argument is that if you take some money from a lot of people, you get more money than if you take a lot of money from some people.
There's also the argument that if everyone pitches in, the overall burden for each individual is less.
What this fails to address is that the richer you are, the more you can play with your money and end up with nothing to tax. This is why the rich get richer and the rest of us don't.
Running through all that is a thing called "trickle down economics" which claims that the money from the rich ends up in society, but recent reviews of this have proven this to be nonsense. Politicians use this as an argument for the status quo.
Finally, the rich shape the narrative. Politicians are essentially elected by the rich through their manipulation of the story through their media empires and social media platforms.
A cookie notice that seeks permission to share your details with "848 of our partners" and "actively scan device details for identification".
Thank you, much appreciated.