59
submitted 1 week ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 week ago

The Holy Grail of energy needs to be so many things. A non exhaustive list:

  1. Clean/low environmental impact
  2. Cheap
  3. Fast to build
  4. Reliable output and able to load-follow
  5. Universally applicable (geography)
  6. Safe
  7. Large scale

Solar and wind don't tick all of these boxes, but neither do fission, fusion, hydroelectric, geothermal, or any other source. That's why we're in this predicament.

The thing about fusion is it doesn't actually bring anything new to the table. It's supposed to be fission but without any radioactive waste, but this isn't actually true. The beryllium cladding in the core of the tokamak (Chinese reactors use this design iirc) becomes irradiated, and when replaced produces a volume of low-level waste far higher than a fission reactor does through its normal operation. And it's going to be way more expensive simply by virtue of being novel to boot.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23236 readers
99 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS