100
Europeans Dehumanize Russians By Calling them “Asian”
(captaincool.medium.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
100 points (94.6% liked)
GenZedong
4288 readers
92 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I gotta heavily disagree with the idea of him being no different than any other nationalists.
He's said before that only the Han Chinese are "smart" enough to have a successful country as China, and he believes that "full communism" is just as bad as full capitalism. I will admit maybe his views have changed and I could be wrong, and he's definitely not pro US. But he is/was very homophobic, and the bad kind of nationalist.
There are a noticeable amount of Han chauvanists in China as well. The CPC and most of the Chinese population don't agree with them though, thankfully.
This is why I always flinch a little when nationalism in revolutionary countries is described as a "good" thing by communists.
Nationalism isn't "good." It's a force that can stand in opposition to imperialism, which is the primary contradiction. In that way, it's useful. But left unchecked, any nationalism can fester and grow into something dangerous. As you've said, Han chauvanism is a real thing in China and hopefully it remains a fringe ideology that dissolves over time.
When I say "good" nationalism, I always mean as in the kind an exploitated socialist or anti-imperialist country has, to stand up against international bourgeoisie. I understand that nationalism is a double-edged sword.