this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
169 points (98.3% liked)

politics

22250 readers
342 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] REgon@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump being a perfect example of a vile human being, incredibly alienating to the rest of the western lackeys, and seeming to have a bit more self-preservation and less interest in plunging the world into WW3 goes a long way in being "less accelerationist,"

Yeah I think this is the bit I don't get, because I read that as being "more accelerationist". I know it's a lot to ask, but would you mind explaining what you understand accelerationism to be or point me in the direction of some good reading?

[–] SadArtemis@hexbear.net 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

FWIW- I'm not an accelerationist, and don't really have any good reading to direct you to in that regard.

That said, to my understanding accelerationism is explicitly pushing to agitate/worsen the material conditions and contradictions of capitalism. And how Trump comes off as "less accelerationist" to me (IMO) is because- for the reasons I described- he is faced with more political resistance, from within the US as well as across the rest of the imperial cores. As for the bit about him being less of a warhawk- well, that goes without saying (that it is undeniably less accelerationist).

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for explaining it to me, I really do appreciate it a lot! I can see what you mean now, it makes sense bean

[–] SadArtemis@hexbear.net 2 points 4 hours ago