this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1028 points (91.3% liked)

Political Memes

5483 readers
3102 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 57 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But I was told it was just that our policy proposals weren't left enough?

Unironically, you're right. Most voters don't vote based on any kind of coherent ideology. They vote on feels.

God help us all.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If the policy proposals were far left enough they'd start to look a helluva lot more like a vision.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

(I wasn't sure whether to edit my comment or reply to your first post, so I'm putting this here)

As for people voting on feels: I think that's always been the case for most people. Most people are of average intelligence, with an average education and average interest in politics. They're gonna vote based on vibes, so you have to get the vibes right or the average person won't vote for you.

And you can't fake vibes by having a bunch of celebrities around.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Clinton 1 and Obama were our last successful Dem candidates. You need a charismatic candidate with a consistent message that speaks to everyone if you want to win the popularity contest. Gore, Clinton 2 and Harris failed on both of those counts. Biden won only because of pandemic and government abuse/mismanagement backlash, he would have lost to Trump in other circumstances.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

In the immortal words of Bowling for Soup: "High school never ends."

Would be helpful if they had more than 3 months to convey it too.

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They’re gonna vote based on vibes, so you have to get the vibes right or the average person won’t vote for you.

And you can’t fake vibes by having a bunch of celebrities around.

So why'd they vote for a rapist who is in pictures with goddamn Epstein? That's the part I don't understand. Are we seriously saying the average (American) is okay with a rapist being president because they like his vibes?

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As far as I can tell, it's not that people who would have otherwise voted for Kamala instead voted for Donald. It's that people who would have otherwise voted for Kamala, including many of those who did vote for Biden, just stayed home. "We've got policy plans and whatever" yeah that would never make it to implementation through a gridlocked congress and a hostile supreme court.

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s that people who would have otherwise voted for Kamala, including many of those who did vote for Biden, just stayed home. “We’ve got policy plans and whatever” yeah that would never make it to implementation through a gridlocked congress and a hostile supreme court.

I honestly think you're giving them more credit than they deserve. My point is that a _rapist, fascist, cruel, racist, misogynist who has said aloud all the horrible things he will do was running for office and a lot of people just shrugged their shoulders and refused to vote. I can't imagine that kind of apathy when a fascist is taking over. "Sure Hitler and the Nazi's are bad, but what am I going to do, vote socialist?"

image

(Also this because people need to remember he was anti-capitalist as well.)

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe. If so, Slipknot was right and people really do = shit. I cannot imagine saying to my women friends and family "okay so you're losing bodily autonomy, but I'm super exhausted about this whole voting thing."

I voted. Most of the women in my family didn't. Most of the women in my family are not and never have been registered to vote.
And this is the sound thundering through my soul for the last few days.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

They’re fucking weirdos with weird vibes.

I’m much more interested in the folks who didn’t vote.

[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I want a country where everyone pays less for healthcare. If it can be done for seniors, why not everyone else?

I want a country where everyone's private medical decisions remain between them and their doctor, without being cleared by your local, state, or federal representative or by a judge.

I want a country where everyone who works, pays taxes, and does not commit violent crime or property theft can stay and keep working without having to look over their shoulder.

I want a country where if you work full time, you can afford your rent/mortgage, put food on the table, start a family, and still be able to retire.

There's a vision. Apparently all of these things have become radically progressive leftist positions and are attacked as such by the media and conservatives alike.

[–] makuus@pawb.social 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

See, the problem with all of these ideas is that they’re at odds with the billionaires’ vision that you slave away in servitude to them, while their imaginary worth line goes up to infinity.

It’s really nothing more complex than that. And, as soon as the non-billionaire conservatives—your neighbors, your coworkers, the people you pass by every day—wake up and understand that they’re covered by that vision, too, the sooner things get better for all of us.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

All of these social programs suddenly become much more popular when they are restricted to the majority population. There have been surveys demonstrating this. Another way to see it is to point to places with a lot of those policies, one of the first rebuttals you will receive is a yarn about the homogeneous population, or at least one far more so, in those places.

So, it isn't that they think they won't be covered, it is because so many think it will cover people they don't want it to.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

With capitalism, a middle class does not occur organically, it is created by the governing body through subsidies. If you do not subsidize a middle class there can be no middle class. This is fundamental. We really started to feel it in 2015 or so. I called it the squeeze. This tightening grip of not subsidies but further attempts to squeeze more and more blood from rocks.

Why? Our government has been subsidizing the wrong class for a while now. Trump did kick that up a notch the first time. The data is in. Trickle down economics doesn’t work.

As with a middle class, health care has to be subsidized. The governing body won’t allow richer people to pay the same taxes as the poorest of us so that will never happen.

And now Elon Musk is promising “hardship” going forward, as opposed to whatever this is the last 4 yrs, on us, the poorest, rather than paying mor taxes himself. Like that would impact his alien ass at all (he’s weirdly shaped, looks like a slightly melted wax museum figure, and was born into so much money he has no idea how humans live, that’s what I mean by alien). So don’t count on it ever happening going forward.

If you have preexisting conditions expect loss of coverage. And as a fallout from that expect the healthcare system to get slammed with much sicker people trying to find loopholes and other diagnoses so they can actually keep living and working.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The data is in. Trickle down economics doesn’t work.

It works for the rich. Relatedly, shitty economies where the government pumps tons of cash into rich people's pockets also work for the rich. They inflate their assets with their additional government handouts and use those inflated asset prices to get loans to buy more mega yachts.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

the system works - for them! You spend your hard earned money and help support their death