this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
186 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19145 readers
3482 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) introduced the Returning Education to Our States Act, aiming to abolish the U.S. Department of Education, a long-time Republican goal aligned with Trump’s agenda.

The bill proposes redistributing the department’s $200 billion budget and responsibilities to other federal agencies and states, such as shifting federal student loans to the Treasury.

Critics warn this could undermine protections for students with disabilities and marginalized groups.

While the bill faces significant political hurdles, it reflects broader GOP efforts to reduce federal influence over education policy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Just keep going with that logic and defunding every public service and let them separate every state until they all become 50 small autonomous countries.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 5 points 4 hours ago

It's been a fierce debate and position held by some since before the US was even officially anything.

The people who want a less federal power also often forget that the US has, until now, been largely blessed by not having to deal with an outside enemy state on their own same soil for prolonged time. Loose control could mean that becomes a real and actual problem.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Red states are about to find out how much they depend on blue state money.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

I've seen GOP Voters on a local news app talking about how they can't wait to see what happens when "California and New York stop asking other states and Big Daddy Government for hand outs!"

And I had to sit down and say "Oh my sweet summer child"

California is the 5th Largest and Most Powerful Economy in the world lol

[–] Thrickles@lemm.ee 13 points 6 hours ago

Putin would love nothing more than for that to happen.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, let them. Then all the blue states can form a union while the red states become a balkanized bastion of hatred.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Man why are we fantasizing about this. What’s the reddest state you can think of, Texas? 42% blue. Florida? 43%. Even in ridiculous places like North Dakota, 1/3 of the people voted blue. What happens to them when blue states form their little utopia?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Is it better to let the entire country suffer then instead? This whole election has been a series of complicated trolley problems

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I hate how accurate this kinda feels 😮‍💨

Maybe we should try nation-states as an idea?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

The problem is that the US is in a fucked up stagnate state, this makes it so the more progressive areas cant improve fast enough and keeps the red states in a place where they are fundamentally incapable of the form required.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 hours ago

Those who can, move?