this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
152 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19145 readers
3049 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) introduced the Returning Education to Our States Act, aiming to abolish the U.S. Department of Education, a long-time Republican goal aligned with Trump’s agenda.

The bill proposes redistributing the department’s $200 billion budget and responsibilities to other federal agencies and states, such as shifting federal student loans to the Treasury.

Critics warn this could undermine protections for students with disabilities and marginalized groups.

While the bill faces significant political hurdles, it reflects broader GOP efforts to reduce federal influence over education policy.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 hour ago

Traitors, all of them.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Ok yes I’m concerned about marginalized and disabled students, but I’m mostly concerned about Americans being too damn dumb already

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 2 points 11 minutes ago

Duh. That's because :

“The federal Department of Education has never educated a single student, and it’s long past time to end this bureaucratic department that causes more harm than good,” Rounds said

/s

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

10 mins later: Mississippi is introducing a mandated co-op middle and high school. Where students only need to be in class 2 days a week and get hands on experience in desirable fields such as farming/agriculture. You just have to work 2 days a week to make sure you get your credits to get to the next grade!

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 32 minutes ago

Don't read up on "no child left behind" then, it's been a huge reason a ton of kids are basically illiterate. Our dept of education doesn't need to be abolished, it needs to be properly funded, so more schools can be built and teachers can be paid more with smaller class sizes.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 44 points 3 hours ago

These people are just such pieces of shit. They truly want to destroy this country and give a decisive lead to the likes of China.

Letting states like Texas run rampant with teaching total bullshit like creationism without any restraint whatsoever is going to further down this country and we might as well cede all advances to other countries.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 38 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Let's think this through... The US Department of Education's functions are primarily:

  1. Establishing policies on federal financial aid for education and distributing as well as monitoring those funds.
  2. Collecting data on America's schools and disseminating research.
  3. Focusing national attention on key educational issues.
  4. Prohibiting discrimination and ensuring equal access to education.

(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Education)

Regarding #1, blue states don't receive nearly as much in financial aid for schools as red states. So abolishing the DOE will reduce the tax burden on citizens living in blue states, at the expense of schools in red states.

Regarding #2, without the DOE compiling this information, it will be up to schools themselves and private research organizations. Badly-performing, severely under-funded schools in red states will, of course, not be able to. Not that they would want to anyway, because without federal assistance, these schools will be in a state of collapse.

Regarding #3, blue states will just focus attention on key educational issues for themselves, while red states focus on fixing their problems by getting bibles into classrooms.

Regarding #4, red states will rapidly descend into systematic discrimination again.

End result: No one will want to hire "graduates" from red states.

This is a self-own of astonishing proportions. The blue states that don't heavily depend on the DOE will manage, while the educational infrastructure in the red states completely falls apart. And businesses in need of skilled employees who can, y'know, read will recruit primarily in blue states.

And the leopards will roam freely through the streets of MAGA-America, feasting on faces in unprecedented numbers.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The guy is from South Dakota. You know, the state known for being one of the Dakotas.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I've heard it called "the lesser of the Dakotas"

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Like the other commenter said, they don’t care about their populous except to remain uneducated and easily controllable, solidifying their conservative control. They’ll bribe the highly educated to come in and lead their industries. Look at any third world country, it’s not their ‘poors’ leading industries, it’s global or foreign experts helping them scrape every drop of wealth from their local communities and environment.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

And the leopards will roam freely through the streets of MAGA-America, feasting on faces in unprecedented numbers.

Yeah, but those that were dumbed down by this system will be more numerous and will vote for qons even harder, dragging all of us down with them.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Clear the way for more educated states to populate our best universities and create a generational gap in education and idiocy then. Morons.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Easiest way to keep voters dumb. The GOP relies on people voting against their own best interests.

And we know Trump knows this, as he was recorded years before stating the economy does better under Democrats....

Also remember his first attempt running for President was in 2000, when he said his running mate was going to be Oprah Winfrey. He held events in California, Florida, and Minnesota before dropping out. I believe he talked about 1 or 2 other presidential runs as well, but never had his ducks in a row. So it was about his 4th time attempting to figure it out in 2016, 5th 2020 and now his 6th time running in 2024.

[–] Supernova1051@sh.itjust.works 54 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

fuck every republican who voted for this.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 29 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

fuck every republican ~~who voted for this~~.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. I've been saying for years that no Republican should be allowed into office, and I stand by that.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Absolutely no politician deserves a seat at the very table they are trying to destroy.

No Republican (with the exception of two -- Romney and Cheney) has not condemned J6 and until they do, they absolutely should not get to sit in office.

Yet...here we are.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

By this, I mean the voters deciding, not necessarily legal measures. Although, as you point out, there are definitely times where legal measures should be getting used, such as J6 and the parallel coup attempt.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Just keep going with that logic and defunding every public service and let them separate every state until they all become 50 small autonomous countries.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 5 points 2 hours ago

It's been a fierce debate and position held by some since before the US was even officially anything.

The people who want a less federal power also often forget that the US has, until now, been largely blessed by not having to deal with an outside enemy state on their own same soil for prolonged time. Loose control could mean that becomes a real and actual problem.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago

Red states are about to find out how much they depend on blue state money.

[–] Thrickles@lemm.ee 13 points 4 hours ago

Putin would love nothing more than for that to happen.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, let them. Then all the blue states can form a union while the red states become a balkanized bastion of hatred.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Man why are we fantasizing about this. What’s the reddest state you can think of, Texas? 42% blue. Florida? 43%. Even in ridiculous places like North Dakota, 1/3 of the people voted blue. What happens to them when blue states form their little utopia?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 0 points 46 minutes ago

The problem is that the US is in a fucked up stagnate state, this makes it so the more progressive areas cant improve fast enough and keeps the red states in a place where they are fundamentally incapable of the form required.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Is it better to let the entire country suffer then instead? This whole election has been a series of complicated trolley problems

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I hate how accurate this kinda feels 😮‍💨

Maybe we should try nation-states as an idea?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 hour ago

Those who can, move?