this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
1430 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19607 readers
4642 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Over the last week, the guide has surged to become the 5th-most-accessed book on Project Gutenberg, an open source repository of free and public domain ebooks. It is also the fifth most popular ebook on the site over the last 30 days, having been accessed nearly 60,000 times over the last month (just behind Romeo and Juliet).

Direct link to the book (without the backref):

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/26184

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 1 day ago (6 children)
  • “Insist on doing everything through ‘channels.’ Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to expedite decisions.”
  • “Make ‘speeches.’ Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your ‘points’ by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate ‘patriotic’ comments.”
  • “Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.” “Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.”
  • “‘Misunderstand’ orders. Ask endless questions or engage in long correspondence about such orders. Quibble over them when you can.”
  • “In making work assignments, always sign out the unimportant jobs first. See that the important jobs are assigned to inefficient workers of poor machines.”
  • “To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give them undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work.”
  • “Hold conferences when there is more critical work to be done.”
  • “Multiply paperwork in plausible ways.”
  • “Make mistakes in quantities of material when you are copying orders. Confuse similar names. Use wrong addresses.”
  • “Work slowly. Think out ways to increase the number of movements necessary on your job”
  • “Pretend that instructions are hard to understand, and ask to have them repeated more than once. Or pretend that you are particularly anxious to do your work, and pester the foreman with unnecessary questions.”
  • “Snarl up administration in every possible way. Fill out forms illegibly so that they will have to be done over; make mistakes or omit requested information in forms.”

But ... but we're already doing every single one of them 🥺

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

Isn't this like the whole SCRUM framework

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Bruh this is my leadership team at work!

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)
  • “To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give them undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work.”
  • “Hold conferences when there is more critical work to be done.”
  • “Multiply paperwork in plausible ways.”

Holy shit, my workplace must be trying to sabotage fascism...

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 2 points 12 hours ago

I really need to keep that spiderman meme in my back pocket, but this was also my first thought

[–] TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I can't upvote this enough....

[–] TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

"hey, boss man created a JIRA ticket for the revolution, they wanna know how many story points we think that will be." 😂

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I work in the development office of a municipality.

I was made for this.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

So, civ v was right, the only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy, is its inefficiency.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Please tell me that's not actually what they tell you to do.

Where's the bombs and general strikes?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (34 children)

Almost half of Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck. A strike means they can't feed or house their kids. Corporations have Americans by the balls and they know it.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I get how all parts of this are effective to sabotage an economy and hurt the ambitions of those at the top. But, as a regular person working within the system, I choose not to discriminate against or complain about other individual workers just trying to get through their day.

That seems counter productive. The best way to resist the oligarchs can’t be to fuck with the other poor people we’re trying to help.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Most points are more focused on decreasing workplace efficiency by ways other than lowering morale.

[–] liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Those not working to dismantle fascism are fascists.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Hey now I didn’t suggest not working against the system and the fascists. I pointed out that targeting the morale and well-being of individuals close to you might not be the best use of one’s energy, assuming underlying motivation is to make the world better for yourself and others.

And you can sabotage the work without being hostile towards an individual. That individual is somebody you should be getting on your side.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 20 hours ago

Youd be much better off trying to unionize your coworkers, that would be far more damaging to the fascist ubercapitalists, and much more beneficial for the workers morale.

[–] liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

Short term pain for long term freedom is needed. If people had your point of view during the American civil war, you'd be the Confederate states of the US.

Every day people are the ones enabling and holding up fascism, not the uniforms, not the leadership, just people like you and your loved ones. Without you fascists have no power. Pressuring those around you, sabotaging their work if it's helpful to the fascists, socially isolating those that refuse to help are the effective steps to take. If you don't take them, you're as bad as any fash with a gun or suit.