this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
825 points (99.2% liked)

Luigi Mangione

1895 readers
4 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 281 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Holy shit can you guys imagine if the jury rules “not guilty, because you got the wrong fucking guy”? Luigi could probably run in 2028 and win.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The oblique implication in my comment is that if orangeboi (illegally) runs for a third term, then it also does not matter if Luigi (illegally) runs when he’s too young

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not? He already illegally ran in 2024, and was illegally inaugurated...

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol wow uh… you know, I guess you do have a point there 🫠

[–] sdfric88@lemmy.sdf.org 79 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lmao this guy thinks there will still be elections

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There will still be elections -- they just won't be fair and legitimate elections.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

50 States all went to the GOP... crazy how that happens now that Elon Musk counts the vote

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 87 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He'd never defeat the Democrats' list of very strong candidates.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 87 points 3 days ago (3 children)

checks list

its just hillary again

[–] 50MYT@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Am I dumb or is AOC not an option

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (2 children)

She is 100% an option, but not for the current Democrat party. They will push her our like they did Sanders.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They'd vote Trump before voting for AOC. At least that's my take from abroad.

[–] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

And mine from not abroad.

The Dems are controlled opposition who are funded by the billionaires just like the Rs.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Democratic party needs to split up. Bernie has been calling on more senators and congressmen to go independent, but none have jumped off the rotten DNC ship.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There's an inherent strategic advantage to claiming the party brand, because so much has been invested in raising its name recognition.

Very hard to get people to throw away a shot at a winnable primary in pursuit of a much more difficult independent run.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We need the infrastructure. The parties are too entrenched in law and election structures...

So the only choice is to tea party them, build a left wing of the party and take over. And I think that's what AOC and Bernie are running around doing, but it's going to take time

In the meantime, we need to resist

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

This. I've been saying for a bit now that we need our own tea party movement to push the DNC left

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Bernie has been independent for essentially his entire career. Why is it possible for him, but not others?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Bernie has been independent for essentially his entire career.

Precisely because he's been in politics since the 80s and is a brand name in Vermont.

And he still caucuses with the Dems. He didn't run for president as an independent. He knows the perils of appearing as a spoiler candidate as well as any Stein or Nader.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

And how much control does Bernie and the other independents have? Not much... He generally votes with the Democrats and occasionally speaks out

We don't need another 5 independents. We need a couple dozen in a cohesive voting block. We need enough that Democrats will be forced to negotiate with them (because maga won't)

It's very hard to win as an independent, but it can be done. We need more then that though - we need a party, we need the network of organizers, the infrastructure for donations, and to integrate with 50 slightly different systems for elections

And most importantly, you need name recognition

All these things would take years of maintained effort to establish, but they exist - better to become a key faction of the democratic party than to compete with them directly

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (5 children)

After Kamala there's no way they'll have another female candidate. The American people would rather vote for all the adjectives that describe Trump than a woman.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That's exactly why they would run another woman candidate. You don't think the dems are trying to win, do you?

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clinton and Harris are just fake smiles on a status quo neoliberal platform. Of course that didn't go anywhere. Elizabeth Warren might have stood a chance. AOC is outright popular now but I don't think she would have won, yet.

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The "Fight Oligarchy" rallies and "Hands Off" protests need to get bigger. Then she could be popular enough.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

After Kamala there’s no way they’ll have another female candidate.

Which is extra funny given that candidates like Gretchen Witmer, Liz Warren, and AOC are some of their most popular candidates the party still has to offer.

Gruesome Newsom is going to clinch then nomination on a platform of "America is a fundamentally misogynistic nation" and liberals are going to waltz into 2028 screaming "Vote for us! We hate women more than the Republicans!"

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Naw Gavin's career is sunk. That podcast sank him

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll believe it when I see it. He's still got the Getty fortune and the Lib half of California media firmly behind him

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, but he's burned his bridges with the Left via transphobia and trying to court the Right, and with the Right by inviting Right Wingers to the podcast and then calling them Bible Thumpers while trying to court them.

He's got a life raft that'll prevent him from drowning overnight, but he took a swing at the big time and missed.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

he’s burned his bridges with the Left via transphobia

He burned it with The Left when he came after the homeless way back during his San Fransisco mayorship. That hasn't really hurt him, because liberals continue to love the guy.

He’s got a life raft that’ll prevent him from drowning overnight

He's the Andrew Cuomo of the West Coast. He'll never drown. Like a fat turd, he'll always float to the top.

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If that's the lesson dems took from the election, dems are going to lose again.

Stop pushing far right republicans as the dem nominees, regardless of their supposed genitals.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was quite a blow to my "all humans are inherently good" mindset, I'm now going with "all humans probably have some deeply rooted cultural biases".

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

all humans are inherently good

Why the fuck would you have thought this to begin with?

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Because babies aren't racist, sexist, etc. We're not perfect, and we get some weird ideas as we go through life, but in general I think most people are generally just trying to get by and do their best.

But also yeah sometimes you have to do a violence or whatever.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maternal instincts, the lived experience of kindness between friends and neighbors, and the last 10,000 years of gradual but undeniable improvements in social equity could argue this point.

I might also argue that humans are fundamentally good, but still highly mutable. So a few bad apples really can spoil the bunch.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 57 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Not 35 years of age or older enough

[–] knightly@pawb.social 112 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The law clearly doesn't matter anymore.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 67 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It does for the right/"wrong" people.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Only as long as those people keep pretending.

In reality everyone knows we can just do whatever.

So executing the rich and forcefully redistributing their wealth is a valid public policy now

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, we've been trying to do other things, but they won't play nice. I guess we need to exterminate a few, then offer the rest the opt-in to pay higher taxes as an alternative.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The landlords that were holding the Chinese economy hostage were given a chance to relinquish their properties, then they executed the ones who wouldn't.

It's only fair we give them an opportunity to surrender.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

We've given them plenty of opportunity. We tried to pass something closer to universal health care, and they shot it down. We tried to raise the minimum wage, they shot it down. Tried to relive student loans, tried to make housing more affordable, nothing.

They have had their warnings.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If orangeboi runs, Luigi should run.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

More like repeat the same action that happened to the CEO of United Healthcare.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can you imagine?

Orangeboi:

word salad

Moderator:

trying not to have a stroke Your response, Mr. Mangione?

Luigi:

BAM

And then everyone clapped

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masta_chief@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And if he were to run for a house seat, and we get 2/3 of congress to vote for a package to do this, we could make him president by impeaching and removing POTUS, VP, and have him be speaker of the house and succeed into the presidency for a special term.

Wishful thinking but it would technically be constitutional. I've tossed this idea and many others in my head about how to get massive support across the country to accomplish something crazy bold like this but I could go on and on and there's lots of what ifs

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sanders was the compromise choice