this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
125 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

513 readers
190 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Federated Farmers of New Zealand is a lobby and advocacy group for farmers and rural communities. ^[Wikipedia]

https://xcancel.com/FedFarmers/status/1926787639874637905

Pine trees are eating up sheep and beef land —not because forestry is a better use of that land, but because of New Zealand’s flawed [Emissions Trading Scheme] settings 🌲 🐑

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Net neutral is still better than net negative tbf

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Permanent native grasslands, often maintained by traditional herding and transhumance practices, have been found to be more effective at carbon storage than planted forests. Not to mention the added benefit of increased biodiversity in local flora and fauna.

Again, it's like 99% clear that the Farmers Federation of New Zealand doesn't mean this kind of grassland of course, but my point is still that planting pines for the sake of planting them is not better than not using the land at all, or to go over it with sheep and cattle.