this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

540 readers
756 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Link

Incidentally, I stumbled on this while looking for a Marx quote about how representatives of the old feudal order falsely positioned themselves as allies to the lower classes by attacking the excesses of industrial capitalism. If anyone has that quote, please let me know.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] lil_tank@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The nobility was supposed to be the military class under feudalism. It became less and less able to actually go to war as feudal contradiction progressed, but originally the lord was supposed to be the one "protecting" the peasants

[โ€“] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It worked up until bows were able to reliably pierce armor.

And even then, it was mostly a protection racket, where you were essentially paying tribute to a king so they wouldn't pillage the lands you lived on and who had left a stay-behind administrator Lord who would pick knights from the locals to administer their territories while they pretty much did whatever they wanted, which was mostly drink and fuck. And you literally prayed that the local knight or administrator was good friends with the Lord otherwise your region would only get increasing tax burden, while other regions whose knights were friends with the Lord would get off easier. This would usually escalate until the peasants in these areas were literally starving after a couple bad harvests and would start a rebellion, usually attempting to appeal to the king to dispose the bad Lord, only for the king to order the Lord to kill the peasants, because that was the whole point to begin with. Better hope you actually have something to offer, and your knight actually gave a shit about his territory, or you were easy pickings for raiding bands. And if the king wasn't able to protect you, it was still illegal for you to seek protection from someone who could.

Rinse and repeat for basically a millennia and a half and that is more or less feudalism in a nutshell. Not that modern capitalism doesn't have it's own versions of all of this.