this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22764 readers
352 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Or was it Biden's victory and liberal's exhaustion with politics in a Trump-era world?

I can't help but wonder if the presence of a Democrat in the presidency just sort of pacifies liberal, left, and radical mass movements and mobilization.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Othello@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

that seems silly, like paint me an alternate timeline. theres no Bernie and the what? half of us wouldn't be here. there is no "left" in america what other thing do you think would have filled that place? a labor movement? definitely not the current union boom can be directly traced back to Bernie and the dsa. the black lives matter movement never had revolutionary potential. you will never have another anti war movement in america, not one capable off effecting anything. fucking liberal "feminist" wont do anything but take selfies in pussy hats. frankly most feminist in this country aren't feminist their racist murderous girlboss imperialist, including black women. not having Bernie wouldn't have made any of this better. also the idea that most bernie suporter were nascent socialist seems silly, did you meet them? they are liberals who want healthcare. they want "scandanavian" stuff, are scandanavians any closer to being communist than us?

[–] Othello@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I thought we all were against great man history around here.

[–] SpookyGenderCommunist@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are. Bernie running for president, and the galvanizing effect he had, were only possible by way of the material conditions of American capitalism in 2016-2020, and the social movements like Occupy, which preceded him.

That doesn't make him not important.

[–] Othello@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i agree that he was important, but important and "ruining the possibility of mass movements" is a huge jump.

[–] SpookyGenderCommunist@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, that I agree with. I disagree with OP that Bernie specifically "Ruined the possibility of mass movements". We're just in a liberal malaise where they've all gone back to brunch, while the world is still burning.

That Said, petite bourgois liberals are hardly the core of many social movements. We ought to be looking to the colonized and oppressed people's in this country to take us anywhere.

[–] Othello@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

agreed agreed, although i do think America specifically will be dragged kicking and screaming into the future.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not in 2019 and early 2020, I was there I saw it happen EVERYONE went in for Bernie, he became the nexus of the American left, for over a year all conversations led back to him

Most of the lefties who went full communism in 2017 and 2018 drank that electoral seltzer, nobody wanted to hear any doomerism on the subject

Then March 2020 hit and suddenly blazing-eyed Lenins were everywhere

Where did that bring you?

spoiler

lenin-shining

Back to me