this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
160 points (100.0% liked)

games

20521 readers
229 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's 20¢ per install max so even if that policy is literal it isn't quite that extreme. But I do wonder if they'll have a policy for someone downloading repeatedly. I have my browser disk cache disabled so I wonder if it's actually literal in terms of install/initialization or if it's more about having some kind of Unity tracker cookie that identifies users.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It isn't extreme until you realize it forces game companies to collect and share a bunch of ~~monetizable personal data~~ sorry "telemetry" from their users, and will probably preclude installing games offline.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Unity already provided data for a study about the effectiveness of China's gaming time limit laws for kids, so they definitely already collect your data

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

I think they've already been doing that for some time.

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

They are going to use unity's built-in telemetry, so you'll have to trust their numbers on top of it all

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

1 cent per install would be extreme. It's a preposterous proposition, devs already pay for the fucking engine.

[–] envis10n@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not only is it per install, it is also retroactive.

It's also ridiculous. They already have their deals in place for successful games made with their engine. Why they don't simply increase the royalty fee instead is beyond me.

[–] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Why they don’t simply increase the royalty fee instead is beyond me.

To set precedent if they can get away with it