this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
211 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
177 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta's new text-based social app Threads has quickly gained 100 million users since launching last week, which appears to be negatively impacting traffic on Twitter. According to web analytics, Twitter traffic declined 5-11% over the first two days Threads was available compared to the previous week. Threads was able to grow rapidly by allowing users to sign up with their existing Instagram accounts and bring over some of their followers. However, Threads has not yet launched in Europe due to regulatory issues. The fast growth of Threads may solidify its position as a real competitor to Twitter, which has over 238 million daily active users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 108 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is a moment when I'd love to use the "you love to see it" meme comment, but it's more like... "People are fleeing the burning building, and running across the street to an identical building that is infested with rats and cockroaches!"

[–] vampatori@feddit.uk 38 points 1 year ago

"Out of the frying pan, into the fire"

[–] g0nz0li0@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe an optimistic take: people moving = people realising they can move. Eventually some of them may also realise they can move to a platform that’s not controlled by a shitty corpo.

[–] sammydee@readit.buzz 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And can instead move to a platform that is controlled by a rando instance owner with their own set of quirks and foibles. And can choose amongst thousands of such instances, each controlled by a different rando with a different set of quirks and foibles. Out of the frying pan and into the fire indeed.

[–] KingStrafeIV@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more like realizing that you're surrounded by fire, so you might as well pick a patch with a nice view.

[–] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Which is why I like Beehaw.

[–] g0nz0li0@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

And can choose amongst thousands of such instances

Kinda glossing over that point.

[–] wildeaboutoskar@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

That's a good point. Plus they won't be as embedded in the new place as they won't have 10+ years of history on it. So moving becomes easier generally

[–] EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

"...and running across the street to an identical building that is infested with rats and cockroaches!"

Still better than Nazis.

[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LibsofTiktok is approved there, so I'm not so sure. Not overwhelmingly Nazi, but Nazis are welcome as long as they don't say slurs kind of thing that centrists like.

[–] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They may not say the slur, but they encode it.

[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly, because that's the line for centrists. Bigoted and hateful statements are perfectly acceptable in cynical corporate "neutral" spaces if they're framed "politely." As long as the bad words aren't used, they're permitted. Libsoftiktok wants nothing less than the total elimination of certain populations of people and there's no way in reality that that should be an acceptable topic of political discussion regardless of word choice.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] pvr@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fediverse has a lot of them too

[–] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately true.

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

The Nazis set the fire, and now they're fleeing along with everyone else.

And hey, I'd rather have them on Threads than in here with us.

[–] shinjiikarus@mylem.eu 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, about that …

[–] sammydee@readit.buzz 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

While ranking the misdeeds of billionaires is a tricky business, given the choice I'd say Zuck is slightly better than Musk at the moment. :)

[–] svarozic@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago

No need to limit yourself to those two awful options when good alternatives exist which aren't run by either of them.

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hard disagree there. Facebook contributed to literal genocide. Elon is just an asshole.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah well. Children are dying every day in cobalt mines because we need minerals for EV batteries

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but unlike Elon's claim, he did not actually invent the electric car. He wasn't even the founder of Tesla. It was going to happen with or without him.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

The guy that sold Bannon the user data he wanted under the table?

[–] DJDarren@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Could I play it safe and fire them both into the sun?

[–] TerryTPlatypus@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Probably better to use "out of the frying pan and into the fire"