285
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

Sorry folks, this didn't look paywalled for me when I posted it.

Links others have provided:

https://archive.md/EwTss

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/12/20/gay-bar-pm-st-louis-police-crash-owner-arrest/71986781007/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This article is utterly devoid of details. I hope to hear more about this soon.

Edit: apparently I did not read the whole thing. I stopped when I got to this:

"To continue reading, log in or subscribe.”

[-] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Cop ran red light, swerved across two lane and hit the gay bar. Then they went after the owner and trumped up an assault charge when witnesses say there was no assault. Oh and first they tried to say they were swerving to miss a dog, then to miss a parked car.

I think that's about the jist of it.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

I read another article with more detail, unfortunately it was a police statement, so you know for a fact it's mostly lies.

They claim he attacked the cops when they crashed through his business, which I don't buy for a second. More likely he got rightly pissed, bitched out the cops and they didn't like being yelled at and arrested him.

[-] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

All of that is in the original article, I'm not sure what you guys are seeing.

Edit: Apparently it's paywalled for some people? No idea why it's not for me.

[-] jimbolauski@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Article says video shows the owner didn't strike the officer.

[-] beerclue@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

There's a lot of detail there... Did you go all the way down? Anyway, that's messed up!

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

... Did you just stop at the title?

There's like 25 paragraphs detailing the whole situation. Only thing really missing is the footage NYT supposedly saw.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There’s like 25 paragraphs detailing the whole situation.

No there isn't. There is only a whiny message bitching at me to turn off private browsing mode and subscribe. An article that refuses to display doesn't count as an article.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wasn't for me, but:

Https://12ft.io

[-] don@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Huh, wasn't for me, but ~~NYT~~ Seattle Times (fooled by the damn font) so...

Https://12ft.io

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
285 points (98.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12172 readers
321 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS