this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
129 points (99.2% liked)

GenZedong

4289 readers
94 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't the hyperloop supposed to be pod based in some far back concept iteration? It's not even train in tunnel, that's just a subway, it's gadgetbahn in tunnels

[–] mughaloid@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It works in vacuum so it's impossible to create. Period.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isambard Brunel, one of history's great engineers, tried to make one in the 1800s.

The project failed due to materials science limits of the day (leather seals for high vacuum)

So he went back to building normal, non-silly railways.

So it's fair to say "maybe we didn't have the technology 150 years ago" but that also means you know exactly what mistakes to not repeat. Of course, this assumes a good-faith operation, not a placebo promised to keep people from demanding normal, non-silly railways in thr first place.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago

Non-physicists when they try to assume a vacuum: angery