this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
258 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22267 readers
509 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 119 points 10 months ago (5 children)

They're alowly rolling back all the freedoms we gained in the last 100 years.

Sometimes I wonder if the threat of communism was the only thing keeping us safe

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 80 points 10 months ago

I'm convinced that it was. The USSR wasn't even fully in the grave yet when the NeoCons showed up to start dancing on Communism's grave with shit like stock buybacks and deep social spending cuts.

[–] SovietWaveGoddess@hexbear.net 62 points 10 months ago

this is the correct position actually.

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"[The Share Our Wealth Program] is the only defense this country's got against communism!" - Huey Long

You can stop wondering, dear, they said it themselves.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago

Also notably, many of the European social programs that American politicians love to screech about were actually promoted by European (and as late as Eisenhower, American) conservatives as a way to keep a lid on communist sentiment. Basically, the idea was that the wealthy could give up a little and in exchange, these programs would keep people happy enough that they wouldn't go and start the revolution. Which, as far as I can tell, actually has worked pretty good so far. I think the US gave up on that because they figured out that using their propaganda machine was a lot cheaper for the wealthy.

But investors are desperate to scuttle those european programs and get those sweet sweet privatization dollars, and I don't think the propaganda machine is quite as powerful there. It would be really funny if the attempts to speedrun removal of social safety nets and implement privatization blew up in their face and led to a brand new revolution.

[–] Diputs@hexbear.net 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It definitely was. I wonder when the next "decades within weeks" moment will happen and finally bring about a paradigm shift for the better. The imperial core is deindustrializing and steadily rolling back so many of the guardrails meant to keep capitalism from imploding one wonders if the theoretical endpoint in a couple centuries is some form of neo-serfdom and subsequently the modern reenactment of the fate of the Romanov dynasty.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 18 points 10 months ago

The end goal is absolutely going back to serfdom. Keep cranking up rent prices until people agree to work for less than minimum wage but they get housing. This sure seems like a good way tonget the ball rolling by making sure people are already locked into poverty wages with no education at the age of 14.